Posted by: Sandaura | March 23, 2011

A CONSTANT, NON STOP “PULSED” LOW RADIO FREQUENCY HUM AND DRONE RADIATING FROM GLOBAL SMART GRID MESH NETWORK!

FINGERPRINT OF 217Hz-SOURCE OF NOISE

WE ARE ALL BEING EXPOSED TO THE BIGGEST AVOIDABLE HEALTH HAZARD IN  THE  HISTORY OF OUR PLANET! 

THE GLOBAL SMART GRID SYNDROME

PLEASE CONTACT US @ globalrfrdefenseteam@verizon.net

Site Updated Daily

We have published this blog for victims who are hearing a constant noise inside as well as outside.  I am coining the term, “SMART GRID SYNDROME” WHEN REFERRING TO THE SYMPTOMS WE ARE EXPERIENCING.  WE ARE ALL EXPOSED  TO THE EMR NOISE AND RADIATION, RESULTING IN THE EMISSIONS OF THE GLOBAL SMART GRID NETWORK.  After visiting forums and  reading several blogs related to this particular noise(s), we found that people, in general, are seeking answers as to what is happening to them and are desperate for the truth.   One blog was consistent with the descriptors of what we have been describing to the State of Massachusetts.  We have confirmed it is a microwave pulsation accompanied by   “pure tones”,  illegal in our State of  Massachusetts. The Regulations were adopted from the EPA  who studied pure tone noise and in 1972 determined it to be a noxious air pollutant, thus being a human health hazard.  Whether proven to be a pure tone or not; it is a nuisance and it is trespassing on and in to your home and the source is the utilities who are leaking carcinogenic microwave frequencies they are injecting through power lines for the Smart Grid communication layer of the global network.  The power lines were designed to transmit electricity.  They are using broadband, Dsl, Wi-Fi, wired, unwired, Sat, cell; whatever they choose to use because they have many options on how to operate the Smart Grid Network.  The noise is a by-product of the Radio Frequency interference, radiation and dirty power riding on the wires and radiating through every outlet in to your home, school and workplace.  The constant pounding of these modulated pulsed signals is biologically invasive to all who are exposed to it and produce serious negative symptoms. Thousands of Medical studies prove this a Public Health Hazard.

DEFINITION OF NOISE   “Noise is an unwanted or objectionable sound”   VERY IMPORTANT!!  When trying to explain this NOISE be aware that the ignorant, be them experts, professionals or not, the noise is incorrectly defined  if it is described as just a sound.  IT IS AN UNWANTED OR OBJECTIONABLE SOUND.  MUSIC IS SOUND, EVERYTHING THAT YOU CAN HEAR IS A SOUND.  THIS is a noise from hell, manmade, radio frequency signals that are leaking into our air causing them to bounce, reflect, enabling them to be heard in  the human hearing range.  These are illegal pure tones (pure tones are extremely rare and not normally found in our environment) and damage  hearing with prolonged exposure.  This is an unprecedented event that has never occurred  for, historically, mankind has never before lived with wireless/bio active microwaves leaking in the air.  How could anyone even fathom such a disaster and that we would be expected to live and be perpetually exposed to this hazardous pollution in our daily lives, 24 hours, day and night, against our will, without permission, with no way to escape it?  The dismissal  of our pleas for help and evidence by our local, State and Federal Governments,  the lack of empathy and desire to do anything about it,  even by victims who are aware and suffering from this technology, is unconscionable.  Without  personal responsibility there will be no resolution or  accountability of the crimes being perpetrated on our Society.  Sickness and death is inevitably the result of doing nothing.

Cause of the Hum (evidence in the forensic fingerprint at top of page)

Our research/investigation has been ongoing since 2006 when the Utilities turned on the Global Smart Grid Network in our town.  The reason for the investigation is due to the Constant noise being heard in our home and around our town.  We have conclusive forensic evidence that ponts to the 902-928MHz unlicensed frequency band being used across the country and Canada to operating the mesh communication layer of the Global Smart Grid Network.  The ARRL in the U.S. and Canada have filed numerous complaints siting the utilities are violating the FCC part 15 rules.  This links our evidence of the 217Hz, which is the audible illegal pure tone measured as per the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.  Our evidence proves a constant tone in our environment, man-made, not allowed in our air as per the EPA  Clean Air Act, which were adopted by Massachusetts in 1990.  The 217Hz is a demodulated pulsed frequency transmitting in concert with 902-928MHz spectrum for communication with the Smart meters.  Our 1/3 octave measurements taken as per MAdep protocol was confirmed by an acoustic engineer revealing the 217Hz is an illegal pure tone, (pulsing also occurs at 8.34Hz)it is in exceedence of the MA Noise pollution Laws. The expert stated the frequency is within human hearing range and would cause a disturbance, especially at night.   We also have the affidavit of A certified Forensic Audio engineer who also confirmed the constant noise is the 217Hz, a modulating pulse.  The measurements taken at our home, 5 miles away from our home and during a major power outage were all identical fingerprints. This is the evidence the Massachusetts Regulatory agencies have in their possession and have blatantly ignored and dismissed by closing the investigation for the 3rd time!  The MA Department of Environmental Protection would not hire their own expert to do overnight pure tone measurements.  They would not include the FCC in the investigation.  They deferred to the utilities to do the overnight pure tone studies.  The utility, National Grid, botched the overnight testing, both, in our home and outside where they placed the meters.  The MA Department of Environment Protection, Department of Public Health and the Department of Public Utilities did not come back to do the overnight pure tone testing as per their testing design.  Instead, they closed our case with no reasonable explanation.

National Grid, USA and other utilities across the country “turned on” in 2006- the 2 way communication fixed and wired AMI network.  Nationl Grid uses the Landis GYR TS-2 AMI technology.  THIS IS WHEN THE CONSTANT NOISE STARTED RADIATING IN OUR AIR;  Carried by the interconnected power grid; turning the wires into one big continuous antenna and electromagnetic weapon!!!  This must be stopped.  Time for our engineers, professionals, experts to pay attention to the biggest death weapon directed at the entire population while assaulting us with NOISE, DIRTY ELECTRICITY 24/7.

Latest research in Germany points to mobile communication radio waves (base station antennas) as source of the hum. The hum is not caused by the cell phones themselves but by the emissions of the base stations (antennas) transported over the air interface.
The low frequent pulsing and modulations of the signals lead to acoustic resonance in buildings. http://archive.is/vSMuu

Bees are frequency-sensitive, like all living organisms: TIMELINE OF THE BEES, BATS BIRDS DEMISE IS LATE 2006=EARLY 2007.  THE TIME LINE IS EXACTLY THE TIME NATIONAL GRID TURNED ON THEIR PERSONAL WIRELESS MESH NETWORK LAYER FOR THE SMART GRID IN OUR TOWN ON MT WILCOX.  LATE FULL/EARLY WINTER THE NOISE BEGAN AND THE NEGATIVE SIDE EFFECTS AS WELL DUE TO THE PULSED SIGNAL FROM THE BASE STATION TRANSMITTING THE 217Hz. There was and is no other cell tower within 5 miles of our home, so this explains why our cell phone works if you face it toward the north in the direction of Mt. Wilcox.  The Antenna, data collector, tower, what ever they choose to call it is filed under the FCC as Personal Mobile.  There is nothing personal about it.  The end user is not the public. It is for corporate use.  Why aren’t these antennas under investigation by the FCC.  They are in violation of the FCC Part 15.   National Grid and all utilities using this wireless protocol is in violation of the clean air act.  They are radiating EMR noise pollution that is harming all living things.

Read an excerpt below: There may indeed be more than one ‘hum’, but since bees are so sensitive to particular frequencies, this is a worthwhile route for research, especially if hives resonate in response to the now all-pervasive EM fields. This is why the HUM we are describing in not related to The Historic HUM Mystery. As stated many times in research studies Hum typically occurs in regional clusters, and rarely within large metropolitan areas. Here is the link to read the full report. http://arizonaskywatch.com/?topic=haarp-and-birds-and-bees-04152007 The Modern Day Hum we have time lined since 2006 is being heard everywhere, not in pockets, clusters or regions. Our registry of people who are hearing the noise we describe are located all across the United States and World. Cities, rural, urban and the like all can hear the Noise we describe and it is a current timeline. The pockets or clusters of the hum, some explained and some still left a mystery could be related to electromagnetic inference and the emissions could have been radiating on the power lines as well, but the reason this is ubiquitous is because of the pulsed RF signals of the wireless devices being employed by the PLC mesh layer of the Global Automated metering infrastructure, which all or most of the population is exposed to.

Our Recordings identify both the hum and the drone:

It is interesting to reflect that many people complain of ‘the hum’, relating electromagnetic sources with an apparently acoustic phenomenon.  GSM mobile phone systems produce a structural pulse frequency of 217Hz; pulsing also occurs at 8.34Hz.  The 8.34Hz is the source of the droning drum-like very low frequency vibration.  I hear both simultaneously 24/7.  You may  hear one or the other or both.

[Excerpt from smartmeterdangers.org]
 SMD Note: Smart meters utilize a 912 MHz frequency and emit pulsed rf radiation 24/7, with full body exposures at up to 160x that of cell phones (Hirsch, 2011). This is an example of thousands of studies that show this is dangerous to the public health. 

——————————————————-

P Esmekaya MA et al, (December 2010) Pulse modulated 900 MHz radiation induces hypothyroidism and apoptosis in thyroid cells: a light, electron microscopy and immunohistochemical study, Int J Radiat Biol. 2010 Dec;86(12):1106-16. Epub 2010 Sep 1

In the present study we investigated the possible histopathological effects of pulse modulated Radiofrequency (RF) fields on the thyroid gland using light microscopy, electron microscopy and immunohistochemical methods. Two months old male Wistar rats were exposed to a 900 MHz pulse-modulated RF radiation at a specific absorption rate (SAR) of 1.35 Watt/kg for 20 min/day for three weeks. The RF signals were pulse modulated by rectangular pulses with a repetition frequency of 217 Hz and a duty cycle of 1:8 (pulse width 0.576 ms). To assess thyroid endocrine disruption and estimate the degree of the pathology of the gland, we analysed structural alterations in follicular and colloidal diameters and areas, colloid content of the follicles, and height of the follicular epithelium. Apoptosis was confirmed by Transmission Electron Microscopy and assessing the activites of an initiator (caspase-9) and an effector (caspase-3) caspases that are important markers of cells undergoing apoptosis. Morphological analyses revealed hypothyrophy of the gland in the 900 MHz RF exposure group. The results indicated that thyroid hormone secretion was inhibited by the RF radiation. In addition, we also observed formation of apoptotic bodies and increased caspase-3 and caspase-9 activities in thyroid cells of the rats that were exposed to modulated RF fields. The overall findings indicated that whole body exposure to pulse-modulated RF radiation that is similar to that emitted by global system for mobile communications (GSM) mobile phones can cause pathological changes in the thyroid gland by altering the gland structure and enhancing caspase-dependent pathways of apoptosis.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20807179
entire article for individual use:
http://www.avaate.org/IMG/pdf/Tiroides_Pulse_modulated_900_MHz_radiation_induce_hypothyroidism_and_apoptosis.pdf

Beyond ear perception, the radiation is also otherwise physically noticed by humans. Reasons that speak for mobile communication as source of the hum:
- correlations between peoples´ reports of first hearing the hum and the setup of antennas in their neighborhood, clearly demonstrable in small towns and villages; increase of the phenomenon parallels setup of antennas;
- physical complaints of hum sufferers are the same as the symptoms that are reported for radio wave sickness
- measurements show artificial signals in the ELF-range; qualitative signal analyses show characteristics of portable radio technology (pulsing, modulation)
- effects of radiation by mobile radio waves on human brain waves in the ELF-range have already been medically proven.

ELF frequencies in mobile communication technology as cause of the hum?

Many people are not aware of the fact that – besides RF frequencies – also low frequencies (ELF frequencies) play an important role in mobile communication technology. This is not only the case with regard to the cell phones (as has been focussed in most publications), but also with regard to the so-called “base stations”.
Low frequencies are used in two techniques: in signal pulsing and in wave modulation.  Our audio also points to an audible bass tone resonance also being heard by victims.

The descriptions that are consistently reaffirmed by victims across the country as well as the world are:

1. Constant noise  2. Humming  3.Buzzing  4. Oscillating pulse  5. Thudding, thumping, rumbling resonance 6. Sounds like a motor idling outside my house 7. can hear it during power outage  8. disturbs sleep  9. unnerving  10. checked all mechanical functions in the home  11. called the utilities; they did nothing 12. Can hear it outside  13. Can hear it sitting with the car turned off.  14. Started hearing it around 2006 to present  15. pressure in the ears and head  16. Not tinnitus 17. Have to sleep with a fan, music, tv to mask the noise; even though I have to listen to another noise than that insidious noise.  18. I can not relax listening to it.  19. Some people hear it some don’t  20. I am afraid to talk about it because people will think I am crazy  21. I have never had trouble sleeping before this noise started  22.  Some mention power lines, microwave  transmitters, cell towers, gas lines, water lines as a theory.  23.  Siren  24. high pitch frequency 25. CAN HEAR IT DURING A POWER OUTAGE.  26.  The noise is present 24 hours a day.

This is to name a few of the descriptors of hearing the Noise.  The Symptoms of the ill effects of being exposed to this noise and radiation pollution are as follows, but not limited to:

Headaches, heart palpitations , vertigo, insomnia, nose bleeds, muscle aches, nervous tension, irritability, anger, feeling not in control of your environment, alienated and not understood, loss of concentration, tired, feeling your body is buzzing, hissing and ringing in the ears from the very high radio frequencies in the Microwave spectrum; radiating in the air and on riding on the power-lines through every outlet of public and private buildings.

Low frequency noise annoyance and stress  (from Noise and Health 2004 Volume 6 Issue 23 Page: 59-72 HG Leventhall

Stresses may be grouped into three broad types: cataclysmic stress, personal stress and background stress. Cataclysmic stress includes widespread and devastating physical events. Personal stress includes bereavements and other personal tragedies. Cataclysmic and personal stresses are evident occurrences, which are met with sympathy and support, whilst their impacts normally reduce with time. Background stresses are persistent events, which may become routine elements of our life. Constant low-frequency noise has been classified as a background stressor (Benton, 1997; Benton and Leventhall, 1994). Whilst it is acceptable, under the effects of cataclysmic and personal stress, to withdraw from coping with normal daily demands, this is not permitted for low level background stresses. Inadequate reserves of coping ability then leads to the development of stress symptoms. In this way, chronic psychophysiological damage may result from long-term exposure to low-level low-frequency noise.

Changes in behavior also follow from long­ term exposure to low-frequency noise. Those exposed may adopt protective strategies, such as sleeping in their garage if the noise is less disturbing there. Or they may sleep elsewhere,  returning to their own homes only during the day.  Victims over time, may undergo character changes, particularly in relation to social orientation, consistent with their failure to recruit support and agreement from the regulatory authority that they do have a genuine noise problem. Their families, and the investigating officer, may also become part of their problem. The claim that their “lives have been ruined” by the noise is not an exaggeration, although their reaction to the noise might have been modifiable at an earlier stage.

Comments on Health, Human Rights, Environmental and Security Concerns With regard to the FortisBC Inc. Application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project, Project No.3698682:

http://www.bcuc.com/Documents/Proceedings/2013/DOC_33386_C9-10-1_CSTS_Jamieson-Evidence.pdf     (referencing the bio-active 217Hz pulsed frequency)

1.2.12.4 Sleep-related fatigue and road accidents  page 34

We have forensic audio evidence proving this is in our environment and ubiquitous throughout our community 24 hours a day. We have identified the noise in several other towns and cities where we have lived and traveled.  We live in a community that does not have cell towers, public sewer, gas lines, industry, major highways.  The only thing we have is Broadband high-speed internet and Wi-Fi and wireless smart meters.  We did not hear this noise until this was rolled out in our town and same follows in the other places we hear the noise.  In our town National Grid is our electric provider.   In 2006 National Grid installed a wireless digital meter on our home without our knowledge or consent.  In order to manage their wireless network it has to be secure so they acquired approval for a secure personal wireless service (a secure server),  in order to communicate and transfer personal information to their central office.  The wireless network within the electric grid is responsible for the constant noise.  The noise began when they connected the wireless smart meter communication mesh layer in our area.  The wireless network is transmitting on the grid even during major outages. This is why it is heard everywhere and ubiquitous in our environment.  This is the Modern day Hum people are wondering about.   It is not a car idling, an air conditioner rattling, highway traffic, industry. We recorded a fingerprint of a pulsed radio frequency, not a power 60Hz sine wave.  It is narrowband, not broadband, it is man made, not something that is natural. To better understand the various ways the modernization or automation of the smart grid is being implemented read:  A Survey of Wireless Communications for the Electric Power System by  BA Akyol H Kirkham, SL Clements,  MD Hadley    January 2010

We have a fingerprint of this noise as a result of retaining a Forensic Audio engineer.  He has confirmed by analyzing recordings of several locations in our town, as well as a recording during a power outage.  The results are identical audio fingerprint.  1/3 octave band testing confirmed a constant noise, the 217Hz, in the 250Hz narrowband, it is a modulating pulse bursting every second with 1/8 second micro bursts.  This is proven science and it has been duplicated and confirmed repeatedly.  The audio recordings have been documented for the past three years, preserved in data form onto CDs.  This evidence, along with our 1/3 octave band results showing illegal pure tones/noise,  power quality results showing dirty electricity/noise, forensic audio results confirming constant noise, witnesses and other residents in our town who have filed noise complaints with the State.  Yet, we are approaching 7 years of willful negligence by  the State and Utilities in not acknowledging their culpability and intentions to clean up the harmful pollution impacting our heath and well-being.   Thousands of health studies prove this is  a public health  hazard; both the acoustic assault and the non-thermal radiation exposure will have a long term health effects.  We are being used for a human experiment.   The long term exposure to the pure tone of the 217Hz can damage the cohlear in the middle ear.  This is why the EPA set pure tone exposure limits for workplaces.  These limits were for 8 hour work shifts.  We are exposed to the 217Hz pure tone 24 hours a day, non stop, every day!!!  Please help us to expose the truth about this deadly technology.  The Smart Grid is not an intelligent technology. It is a ruthless, greedy, sinister, desperate plan, with no regard for human life.  The Radio frequency spread spectrum of the 902MHz-928MHz being used on the mesh layer of Global Smart metering infrastructure  uses the 217Hz demodulated pulsed frequency to to carry its signal 24 hours a day non stop.  This is why it is heard during a power outage as well.

If you are a victim of this noise please contact us by emailing the globalrfrdefenseteam@verizon.net.  The only way we will be able to get attention on this issue, is by proving the pollution is wide-spread.   We are looking for victims to post their location and experience of hearing this noise and include when you started hearing it.  Please leave your testimonials on the Smart Meter testimonial page.  We are also interested in collecting data in your area.   PLEASE, we are only interested personal experiences and nothing that predated Wireless high-speed broadband and Wi-Fi roll-out, Power-line 2 way communication and the wireless digital meter put on our home in September of 2006, without our knowledge or consent.  Our complaints predated our knowledge or awareness of what the smart grid is about.  We have documented complaints to the State and utilities that prove our symptoms we experienced was not pointing to the smart meters at the time.  We knew it was electromagnetic in nature because of the audible harmonics. Our power quality testing pointed to the utility side.  The report prompted The state to open another investigation,  not to our surprise, was all smoke and mirrors.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_weapon

Noise-induced neurologic disturbances in humans exposed to continuous low frequency tones for durations longer than 15 minutes has involved in some cases the development of immediate and long-term problems affecting brain tissue. The symptoms resembled those of individuals who had suffered minor head injuries. One theory for a causal mechanism is that the prolonged sound exposure resulted in enough mechanical strain to brain tissue to induce an encephalopathy.[14]

Please visit our videos on YouTube:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mLtygxIaFs

“I have no doubt in my mind that at the present time, the greatest polluting element in the earth’s environment is the proliferation of electromagnetic fields.  I consider that to be far greater on a global scale, than warming, and the increase in chemical elements in the environment.”      Dr Robert O. Becker, M.D.  twice nominated for Nobel Prize of this research.

If you would like to donate to our Legal Fund you may send contributions by contacting us                

We need your help to legally force the Massachusetts Regulatory Agencies to do their job and to enforce the laws appropriately. This will set a precedent for your State.  Show your appreciation by donating to the Legal Fund by emailing us at globalrfrdefenseteam@verizon.net.

About these ads

Responses

  1. C4ST – Very important Ottawa Press Conference July 9 2014 Save All

    http://www.c4st.org/

    The webpage above contains a video of an extremely important press conference held in Ottawa this morning.

    On the web page, click the red ’10:30 AM Press Conference’ regarding the failure to protect from wireless radiation and the health impacts (Ottawa press conference this morning).

    Please pass this link to others who may be interested.

    Thank you!

    Ron

  2. Press Release
    Contact: Emily Roberson
    National Institute for Science,
    Law & Public Policy
    610-707-1602
    er79000@yahoo.com

    Survey by the National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy Indicates Cell Towers and Antennas Negatively Impact Interest in Real Estate Properties
    94% of respondents said a nearby cell tower or group of antennas
    would negatively impact interest in a property or the price they
    would be willing to pay for it.

    July 3, 2014, Washington, D.C. A survey conducted in June 2014 by the National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy (NISLAPP) in Washington, D.C., “Neighborhood Cell Towers & Antennas—Do They Impact a Property’s Desirability?”, shows home buyers and renters are less interested in properties located near cell towers and antennas, as well as in properties where a cell tower or group of antennas are placed on top of or attached to a building.

    Of the 1,000 survey respondents, 94% reported that cell towers and antennas in a neighborhood or on a building would impact interest in a property and the price they would be willing to pay for it. And 79% said under no circumstances would they ever purchase or rent a property within a few blocks of a cell tower or antennas. And almost 90% of respondents said they were concerned about the increasing number of cell towers and antennas in their residential neighborhood, generally. See Full Results here: http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/survey-property-desirability/

    The NISLAPP survey reinforced the findings of a study by Sandy Bond, PhD of the New Zealand Property Institute, and Past President of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society (PRRES), published in The Appraisal Journal in 2006, The Impact of Cell Phone Towers on House Prices in Residential Neighborhoods. That study found buyers would pay as much as 20% less, as determined at that time by an opinion survey in addition to a sales price analysis.

    Jim Turner, Esq., Chairman of the National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy, says, “The results of the 2014 NISLAPP survey suggest there is now high awareness about potential risks from cell towers and antennas, including among people who have never experienced cognitive or physical effects from the radiation.” He adds, “A study of real estate sales prices would be beneficial at this time in the Unites States to determine what discounts homebuyers are currently placing on properties near cell towers and antennas.”

    Read More
    http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/survey-property-desirability/

    ElectromagneticHealth.org Commentary on the NISLAPP EMF Real Estate Survey Results
    http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/survey-commentary/

  3. From Lidia Filipova, U.K.

    My Petition to investigate and stop the hum: (Please help to circulate it. Any suggestions for improvement?

    https://www.causes.com/actions/1684382-launch-a-new-investigation-for-the-hum-cause-under-the-government-bodies-of-the-usa-canada-australia-uk-and-most-of-the-eu-countries-stop

  4. Mind Control Technologies Of The EMF Spectrum

    In English translated from German, 2003

    NON – LETHAL WEAPONS
    PLASMA-SONIC-HPM-RF
    Abstract

    In 1997 was published,that victims of – Microwave Hearing System
    dont have michrochips in the head. That was 40 years military
    international TOP SECRET. Today explore microwave radiation on
    humans UK,France,America and Russia.It are criminal groups
    recruited over World, for testing peoples. These criminal groups
    are recruit like »operaters« for talk by pc-computers to victims
    and RF signal go direct in the heads (2D Satelite Sound System).
    It is mind control use on peoples, from NATO and Secret services
    FBI,CIA,KGB.Today after 2000 is the worst international military
    crime over World.
    1
    EUROPA – TARGETED INDIVIDUALS
    The human mind has never been a simple project. Because of its
    complexity and plasticity, it has yet not been completely
    understood. Under the dark ages of brain research, scientists have
    nevertheless learned how to stimulate and partially control the
    human brain’s responses. At any time it has been done, it has
    caused pain and suffering for the owner of the brain: the human
    subject. Backed up by the “best” scientists, sponsored by the
    military and the secret service, thousands of individuals have
    their lives destroyed in the quest of developing technologies
    that are not science fiction anymore.
    The human brain, is seen as a computer where information can be
    downloaded and from where information can be uploaded. Cloning
    the individual’s brain and nervous system is the only hope today’s
    scientists have to understand the human brain and develop advanced
    artificial intelligence and synthetic telepathy, allowing people
    to communication by thought, not speech. The European and World
    countries governments, faced with this “challenge” are unable to
    protect their citizens against the greatest possible violations of
    their human rights. There are no excuses whatsoever for researchers
    to destroy people’s and entire families lives. Under the secrecy
    of “national security”, they violate human rights conventions and
    every universal human right a human being is born with, going deep
    into the very consciousness of the person that is affected.
    Many human rights campaigners from around the world have spent
    years working on countless books, videos, websites, rallies and
    symposiums which highlight these matters. These include efforts by
    prominent persons like Dr Nick Begich, Dr Rauni Kilde (ex chief
    medical officer for Finland) and well known author Gloria Naylor.
    To date, all of it has been ignored by the criminally
    owned/controlled media. However, most importantly, there has been
    open condemnation of these methods by major political entities and
    I ask you to focus on these…
    2

    Brain-Wave Detection.
    Some 40-odd years ago, university professor F. Cazzamalli started
    publishing papers on the subject of brain-wave detection [using radio
    signals] and implied that he had detected radiations from the mind. [See
    image above.] As shown in Fig. 4, he placed his subjects in a shielded room
    (or Faraday cage), emanated VHF radio waves through their heads, and
    claimed to have recorded “beat frequencies” obtained with an untuned
    receiver consisting of a galena crystal or diode tube [same thing for
    practical purposes], a fixed capacitor, an antenna, and a sensitive light beam
    galvanometer.
    [A "galvanometer" is a voltmeter; light beam types show up in physics labs
    and are one of the most sensitive types of voltmeter.]The trouble is that
    Cazzamalli never mentioned transmitter power in his somewhat
    unprofessional papers [that's why we can't use this experiment directly as
    standalone evidence]. His oscillograms meant to show variations of the
    “beat” when his subjects were emotionally aroused or engaged in creative
    tasks when they were in the Faraday cage. ["Beat" as used by Cazzamalli
    refers to EEG-frequency, i.e. ELF, traces.]
    Later he told an astounded world that his subjects would hallucinate when
    under the influence of his “oscillatori telegrafica”, it’s frequency being
    around 300 MHz at the time. [Aviation radios are in this range.] Tom Jaski, a
    noted science writer and engineer duplicated some of Cazzamalli’s work
    with a modern low-power oscillator that was swept from 300 MHz to 600
    MHz. [Cell phones start at over…… 900 MHz.] His subjects could not see the
    dial. They were told to sound off as soon as they felt something unusual.

    Accidental exposure to microwave radiation is possible in many civilian and military occupations. To protect personnel, current microwave safety standards were set for a whole-body specific absorption rate
    (SAR) of 0.4 W/kg, which is a factor of 10 below the threshold for performance changes in animals (4 W/kg). The animal exposures, however, have been whole-body exposures where the entire body is
    immersed in a uniform microwave field. Accidental human exposure can involve either the entire body or only part of the body exposed to microwave fields. This was recognized in the safety standards by
    allowing a maximum localized SAR of 8 W/kg in any 1 g of tissue. This SAR, however, was based primarily on data from experiments measuring the absorption in models of man. The purpose of this study was to
    determine the effects of localized exposure of only the head to pulsed microwaves on monkey behavior.

    FINDINGS
    Behavioral alteration was characterized by decrements in response rate but not by changes in reaction time, yellor iight errors, and post reinforcement pause time. The threshold SAR for the observed
    changes was between 16 and 26 W/kg absorbed in the monkey head.

    RECOMMENDATIONS
    The behavioral threshold range determined in this study for a localized exposure to the head to produce a behavioral effect was 16-26 W/kg, which is well above the 8 W/kg safety standard for localized
    exposure. However, this localized exposure threshold does not provide a safety factor of 10 as is the case with the whole-body exposure standard.
    In 1997 was published,that victims of – Microwave Hearing System
    dont have michrochips in the head. That was 40 years military
    international TOP SECRET. Today explore microwave radiation on
    humans UK,France,America and Russia.It are criminal groups
    recruited over World, for testing peoples. These criminal groups
    are recruit like »operaters« for talk by pc-computers to victims
    and RF signal go direct in the heads (2D Satelite Sound System).
    It is mind control use on peoples, from NATO and Secret services
    FBI,CIA,KGB.Today after 2000 is the worst international military
    crime over World.

    Excerpts from: http://www.rense.com/general96/21BOOKNONLETHALWEAPONS.pdf

  5. U.S. pushing local cops to stay mum on cellular surveillance
    chicagosuntimes.com

    Thursday12/2014 – 1:37pm

    WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has been quietly advising local police not to disclose details about surveillance technology they are using to sweep up basic cellphone data from entire neighborhoods, The Associated Press has learned.

    Citing security reasons, the U.S. has intervened in routine state public records cases and criminal trials regarding use of the technology. This has resulted in police departments withholding materials or heavily censoring documents in rare instances when they disclose any about the purchase and use of such powerful surveillance equipment.

    Federal involvement in local open records proceedings is unusual. It comes at a time when President Barack Obama has said he welcomes a debate on government surveillance and called for more transparency about spying in the wake of disclosures about classified federal surveillance programs.

    Lawsuit seeks details on Chicago Police purchases of cellular tracking gear

    One well-known type of this surveillance equipment is known as a Stingray, an innovative way for law enforcement to track cellphones used by suspects and gather evidence. The equipment tricks cellphones into identifying their owners’ account information and transmitting data to police as if it were a phone company’s tower. That allows police to obtain cellphone information without having to ask for help from service providers, such as Verizon or AT&T, and can locate a phone without the user even making a call or sending a text message.

    But without more details about how the technology works and under what circumstances it’s used, it’s unclear whether the technology might violate a person’s constitutional rights or whether it’s a good investment of taxpayer dollars.

    Interviews, court records and public-records requests show the Obama administration is asking agencies to withhold common information about the equipment, such as how the technology is used and how to turn it on. That pushback has come in the form of FBI affidavits and consultation in local criminal cases.

    “These extreme secrecy efforts are in relation to very controversial, local government surveillance practices using highly invasive technology,” said Nathan Freed Wessler, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, which has fought for the release of these types of records. “If public participation means anything, people should have the facts about what the government is doing to them.”

    Harris Corp., a key manufacturer of this equipment, built a secrecy element into its authorization agreement with the Federal Communications Commission in 2011. That authorization has an unusual requirement: that local law enforcement “coordinate with the FBI the acquisition and use of the equipment.” Companies like Harris need FCC authorization in order to sell wireless equipment that could interfere with radio frequencies.

    A spokesman from Harris Corp. said the company will not discuss its products for the Defense Department and law enforcement agencies, although public filings showed government sales of communications systems such as the Stingray accounted for nearly one-third of its $5 billion in revenue. “As a government contractor, our solutions are regulated and their use is restricted,” spokesman Jim Burke said.

    Local police agencies have been denying access to records about this surveillance equipment under state public records laws. Agencies in San Diego, Chicago and Oakland County, Michigan, for instance, declined to tell the AP what devices they purchased, how much they cost and with whom they shared information. San Diego police released a heavily censored purchasing document. Oakland officials said police-secrecy exemptions and attorney-client privilege keep their hands tied. It was unclear whether the Obama administration interfered in the AP requests.

    “It’s troubling to think the FBI can just trump the state’s open records law,” said Ginger McCall, director of the open government project at the Electronic Privacy Information Center. McCall suspects the surveillance would not pass constitutional muster.

    “The vast amount of information it sweeps in is totally irrelevant to the investigation,” she said.

    A court case challenging the public release of information from the Tucson Police Department includes an affidavit from an FBI special agent, Bradley Morrison, who said the disclosure would “result in the FBI’s inability to protect the public from terrorism and other criminal activity because through public disclosures, this technology has been rendered essentially useless for future investigations.”

    Morrison said revealing any information about the technology would violate a federal homeland security law about information-sharing and arms-control laws — legal arguments that that outside lawyers and transparency experts said are specious and don’t comport with court cases on the U.S. Freedom of Information Act.

    The FBI did not answer questions about its role in states’ open records proceedings.

    But a former Justice Department official said the federal government should be making this argument in federal court, not a state level where different public records laws apply.

    “The federal government appears to be attempting to assert a federal interest in the information being sought, but it’s going about it the wrong way,” said Dan Metcalfe, the former director of the Justice Department’s office of information and privacy. Currently Metcalfe is the executive director of American University’s law school Collaboration on Government Secrecy project.

    A criminal case in Tallahassee cites the same homeland security laws in Morrison’s affidavit, court records show, and prosecutors told the court they consulted with the FBI to keep portions of a transcript sealed. That transcript, released earlier this month, revealed that Stingrays “force” cellphones to register their location and identifying information with the police device and enables officers to track calls whenever the phone is on.

    One law enforcement official familiar with the Tucson lawsuit, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to speak about internal discussions, said federal lawyers told Tucson police they couldn’t hand over a PowerPoint presentation made by local officers about how to operate the Stingray device. Federal officials forwarded Morrison’s affidavit for use in the Tucson police department’s reply to the lawsuit, rather than requesting the case be moved to federal court.

    In Sarasota, Florida, the U.S. Marshals Service confiscated local records on the use of the surveillance equipment, removing the documents from the reach of Florida’s expansive open-records law after the ACLU asked under Florida law to see the documents. The ACLU has asked a judge to intervene. The Marshals Service said it deputized the officer as a federal agent and therefore the records weren’t accessible under Florida law.

    JACK GILLUM AND EILEEN SULLIVAN, Associated Press

    Associated Press writer Brendan Farrington in Tallahassee, Florida, contributed to this report.

    http://politics.suntimes.com/article/washington/us-pushing-local-cops-stay-mum-cellular-surveillance/thu-06122014-137pm

  6. Jun 8, 2014

    94 Organizations Submitted an Amicus Brief on EHS in the Case of Arthur Firstenberg

    On Monday, June 2nd, 2014, I submitted an Amicus Brief to the Appellate Court of the State of New Mexico, in the case of Firstenberg v. Monribot. Usually an Amicus Brief is submitted in support of one of the parties. In our case, the brief intends to support Arthur Firstenberg’s position.

    In this case, Arthur Firstenberg, submitted an action against his neighbor for nuisance, claiming that her use of wireless gadgets was harming his health and forced him to leave his house. The first instance ruled that EHS is not a real condition but a psychological problem and the brief was submitted as part of the appeal of the decision

    The brief was submitted on behalf of 94 (!) organizations from 22 countries (!) which have decided to join the brief. We did not expect such overwhelming support! I want to thank all of you – the organizations that joined and everyone who helped us get organizations to join and there were many! The list of organizations is listed in the end.

    To read the brief, please contact me and I’ll email it to you.

    Explanation of the Amicus Brief

    As many of the organizations are neither from the US, nor from English speaking countries, I’ll use simple language and as little legal jargon as possible to enable everyone to understand our action.

    I’ll start with the technicalities – in the US, an attorney can practice law only in the state where she took the bar exam and was subsequently admitted to practice law. She cannot practice automatically in other states within the US. I am licensed to practice law in the State of NY (and in Israel). Since Arthur’s case is in the state of New Mexico, I had to use something called “Pro Hoc Vice”- I submitted an application to the New Mexico Bar Association to be allowed to practice law in New Mexico only for this one case. In order to be able to do that, a New Mexico Attorney had to ‘sponsor’ me. Ms. Stefanie Beninato, a New Mexico attorney agreed to sponsor me. Therefore under my signature, she is signed on the brief as well.

    Consent of the parties and the court to accept the Amicus Brief

    Since the 94 organizations, who are called the ‘Amici’, and I, Dafna, as their attorney, are not party to the lawsuit – we are not the Plaintiff and not the Defendant, but we are merely asking the Court to be allowed to join the case in a status known as “Friend of the Court” – we had to ask for the consent of the Plaintiff and the Defendant and for the consent of the Court to submit the amicus brief. I sent the request to the parties and both parties, the Plaintiff and the Defendant, agreed, and the brief was submitted to the Court with the parties’ consent. Now we have to wait to learn whether the Court agrees to accept the brief. The fact that both parties consented increases the chances that the Court will agree to accept the amicus brief.

    The content of the brief that was submitted

    When you read the brief that I submitted, you may think that many other points could have been raised, that more studies exist to indicate the existence of EHS etc. and you are right. But we could not write it all as we were limited by legal restrictions, and we did our best within the limitations.

    The limitations as to what we could argue

    Arthur’s case was not heard in the district court. It was ‘dismissed’ without the Court hearing Arthur’s evidence and experts as to EHS. Therefore, the appeal is not asking the Appellate Court to judge the science on EHS, but instead, focus on the law, on the legal arguments asking the Court to order the district court, which ruled that EHS is not an acknowledged condition without properly examining the evidence and dismissed the case, to hear the evidence on EHS before dismissing the case.

    For this reason, Arthur’s appeal brief is focusing on technical legalities, on why the decision of the trial judge to dismiss the case without hearing the evidence is legally wrong. Therefore, his appeal brief is not dealing with the evidence regarding the existence of EHS but rather, it is focusing on legal arguments.

    As a result, we could not discuss the evidence as to the existence of EHS. We could not bring new evidence (with some exceptions), we were only allowed to use the evidence which was already submitted, and we could not argue as to the existence of EHS, the false WHO decision, the flawed Rubin papers etc.

    The Content of the Brief

    What we could do, and should have done as the Amici, and as we did, was to focus on two things:

    (1) Show that EHS is not only Arthur’s problem but a widespread problem in the US and worldwide – We did it in two ways – the first, the fact that 94 organizations from around the world, all organizations which deal directly and/or indirectly with EHS, joined the brief, by itself indicates the extent of the problem; the second, by using studies as to the extent of EHS and which were already submitted into Evidence by Arthur.

    (2) Show that EHS is a recognized medical problem – As the trial Judge dismissed the case and said that EHS is not recognized, we showed the Court that the trial judge was wrong, as EHS is recognized.

    We also could have contested the legality of the trial judge’s decision but since Arthur did it so thoroughly in his brief, I did not see any point in repeating his arguments.

    What Next

    We have to wait and see if the Court decides to accept the brief. I’ll let you all know once I get the Court’s decision.

    Once again, I thank all the organizations which joined this action and to everyone who helped! I’m glad we all joined together in this action and I hope we continue to support each other in this important and urgent work.

    I will not submit an Amicus Brief in Arthur’s second case

    When I was looking for organizations to join the Amicus Brief in support of Arthur’s cases, I was considering trying to submit an Amicus Brief in both cases. Unfortunately, I will not be able to submit the brief in the second case. About a week ago, Arthur was informed that the brief in his second case will be due this month. This does not allow me enough time to work on the second brief, especially as I have to continue work on the case in Israel. If another attorney is willing to volunteer to write the brief that would be great.

    I hope New Mexico’s Appellate Court accepts Arthur’s claims and orders that an examination of the evidence as to EHS be conducted.

    On a personal note – in order to submit the brief, we paid about $2,000 for various expenses, not including the time for my work. Any donation would be appreciated.

    Identification of Amici Curiae

    UNITES STATES

    Center for Safer wireless; Clear Light Ventures;
    Stop Smart Meters;
    WAVE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION RESEARCH;
    Wireless Education Action;
    The EverGreen Center;
    Stop Smart Meters NY;
    The Maine Coalition to Stop Smart Meters;
    COALITION FOR HEALTH AGAINST SMART METERS;
    PEOPLE AGAINST CELL TOWERS AT SCHOOL;
    EMF REFUGEE: INTERNATIONAL COALITION FOR AN ELECTROMAGNETIC SAFE PLANET;
    Center for Electrosmog Prevention;
    NAPERVILLE SMART METER AWARENESS;
    Maryland Smart Meter Awareness;
    Sedona Smart Meter Awareness;
    Healing Earth & EMF Refuge;
    EMR ACTION DAY;
    GLOBAL RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION DEFENSE TEAM; DEFENDERS OF THE BLACK HILLS;
    Citizens for a Radiation Free community;
    TEXANS AGAINST SMART METERS;
    LUBBOCK AGAINST SMART METERS;
    STOP SMART METERS GEORGIA

    EUROPEAN

    EUROPEAN EMF WORKING GROUP of the EUROPEAN ACADEMY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE (EUROPAEM);

    AUSTRALIA

    ES.OZ;
    Stop Smart Meters Australia, Inc;
    AUSTRALIAN CHEMICAL TRAUMA ALLIANCE; OREAD PROJECT;

    CANADA

    CANADIANS FOR SAFE TECHNOLOGY (C4ST); CITIZENS FOR SAFE TECHNOLOGY; KAWARTHA SAFE TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE;

    Coalition to Stop Smart Meters; THE LAKESHORE COALITION;

    COLOMBIA

    Escuela de Autoindagación;

    DENMARK

    EHS FORENINGEN (EHS Association of Denmark); Rådet for Helbredssikker; mast-victims.org;

    FAROE ISLANDS

    ErbylgjufelagiÐ (“Microwave Association”);

    FINLAND

    Sähköherkät ry;

    FRANCE

    NEXT-UP; Robin des Toits; ELECTRICSENSE;

    GERMANY
    Bürgerwelle e.V., Dachverband der Bürger und Initiativen zum Schutz vor Elektrosmog (“Umbrella Organization of Citizens and Initiatives to Protect Against Electrosmog”); Ärzteinitiative Bamberger Appell; Verein für Elektrosensible und Mobilfunkgeschädigte e.V. (The Association of Electrosensitives in Munich); Gruppe Strahlen-Entlastung (“Radiation Relief Group”);

    Strahlenfreier Ammergau (“Radiation-free Ammergau”); Bürger gegen Elektrosmog e.V. (Citizens against Electrosmog);

    HOLLAND

    Stichting EHS (EHS Foundation);

    INDIA

    Citizens Resource and Action Initiative; ASSOCIACIÓN INDIA (INICIATIVA NADIE MÁS DAÑADO POR IRRADIACIÓN DE ANTENAS);

    The Cuffe Parade Residents Association; Action Against Cell TowerS, Bandra; Bandra West Residents Association;

    Bhulabhai Desai Road Residents; Carmichael Road Residents Association; Dadar Parsi Colony; Forum Against Cell Towers, Dadar; Indians for Safe Environments; Malabar Hill Residents Association; Matunga Residents Group; Nepean Sea Road Citizens Forum; Pedder Road Residents Association; Santacruz Residents Group; Sion Residents Group; V Citizens’ Action Network; Wadala Residents Group

    IRELAND

    Irish Doctors EnvironmentalAssociation; Irish Electromagnetic Radiation Victims Network; Parents for Safe Tech Ireland;

    ISRAEL

    NO RADIATION FOR YOU (NoRad4u);

    ITALY

    Rete No elettrosmog Italia (“No Electrosmog Network”); Associazione per le Malattie da Intossicazione Cronica e/o Ambientale (“Association for Illness from Chronic and/or Environmental Toxicity”);

    JAPAN

    LIFE-ENVIRONMENT NETWORK; Meeting on EMF and Other Environmental Issues of The Kansai Region;

    NAMIBIA

    RADIATION AWARENESS NAMIBIA;

    NEW-ZEALAND

    ESNZ Trust; Safer wireless Technology NZ, Inc.;

    NORWAY

    FOLKETS STRÅLEVERN (“Citizens’ Radiation Protection”);

    SWEDEN

    ELÖVERKÄNSLIGAS RIKSFÖRBUND (Swedish Association for the Electrohypersensitive); VÅGBRYTAREN;

    SWITZERLAND

    Association Romande Alerte aux Ondes Électromagné­tiques (“French-Swiss Association Alert to Electromagnetic Fields”); GIGAHERZ – Schweizerische Interessengemeinschaft Elektrosmog-Betroffener (“Swiss Interest Group for the Electrosmog-Affected”);

    SPAIN

    AVAATE – ASOCIACIÓN VALLISOLETANA DE AFECTAD0S POR LAS ANTENAS DE TELECOMUNICACIONES (“Valladolid Association of those Affected by Telecommunications Antennas”); ELECTROSENSIBLES POR EL DERECHO A LA SALUD (“Electrosensitive for the Right to Health”); La Coordinadora de la Plataforma Estatal contra la Contaminación electromagnética (PECCEM) (“National Platform Against Electromagnetic Contamination”); FUNDACIÓN VIVO SANO; Associació Ensalut; domosalud Asociación Ciudadana por la Salud Ambiental (“Domosalud Citizens’ Association for Environmental Health”);

    UNITED KINGDOM

    ElectroSensitivity UK (ES-UK); RADIATION RESEARCH TRUST; Foods Matter; MCS-AWARE;

    Posted by Dafna Tachover, Esq. (NY, Israel) MBA at 7:11 PM
    Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

  7. Update from Sandaura:

    We are continuing to receive emails and calls everyday from those who are being harmed from the EMR radiation and noise pollution coming from the smart grid infrastructure. Several complaints to State regulatory agencies have been filed in New Jersey, New York, Texas, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, New Mexico, Oregon, California, North Carolina, Nevada, Michigan, Illinois, Idaho, Maine, Arizona, Montana, Colorado, Missouri, and Florida. The utilities in every case came to investigate as they are obligated to do; then found no issue. The States have followed the same script, often stating they never heard of this before while dismissing the complaints.

    We urge everyone who is being harmed to file the letter, thereby establishing
    the documentation of this issue for further actions we will take. The interest is growing as awareness and education is key in getting the help we need from the professionals who can litigate and provide the expert evidence necessary in moving forward. We are gaining ground in this area and there are those in a position to help wanting to do so. It is a matter of time before a class action suit will be filed. Meanwhile those who have become refugees, who have had to flee their homes because of the harm on their person, we will fight for those who are too sick to fight, but we still need those capable to come forward and join us in helping to stop the noise pollution destroying our quality of life as well as the wildlife which is diminishing daily. This is our fight, not mine alone.

    Education of the public is a slow process because the majority wants to believe this technology is benign. We can still have our toys, but in a responsible way; not this way. Believe in your fellow American who is suffering by the direct result of a smart meter on their home. Why would you believe the industry, faceless cowards who are selling dangerous and unsafe devices for profit? Pulsed RF frequencies are proven to be incompatible with all livings things? What are you waiting for? Your children are more important than a device emitting life threatening radiation. What is it going to take? IQ has nothing to do with believing in the harm. I have witnessed this!

  8. Study on Magnetic Compass Orientation in Birds Builds Case for Bio-Inspired SensorsMay 09, 2014
    Researchers show that migratory birds are unable to use their magnetic compass in the presence of urban electromagnetic noise. The findings open up new areas of study for magnetic sensors.

    Researchers working on DARPA’s Quantum Effects in Biological Environments (QuBE) program have shown that the electromagnetic noise that permeates modern urban environments can disrupt a bird’s internal magnetic compass. The findings settle a decades-long debate into whether low-level, artificial electric and magnetic fields can affect biological processes in higher vertebrates. For DARPA, the results hint at a new class of bio-inspired sensors at the intersection of biology and quantum physics.

    In an online Nature paper, research teams from the University of Oldenburg and the University of Oxford, led by Prof. Henrik Mouritsen, document a series of experiments using European robins that were carried out from 2005 to 2011.

    Night-migratory songbirds like European robins have an internal magnetic compass that allows them to choose the correct migratory direction during the spring and fall migration seasons. However, when the robins used in the Oldenburg experiments were exposed to everyday levels of electromagnetic background noise, the birds failed to orient themselves correctly. When the researchers later shielded the birds from background electromagnetic noise, the birds oriented to the correct migratory direction. Birds tested in rural environments, far from sources of electromagnetic noise, required no screening to properly orient using their magnetic compass. Full details of the experiments are available in the paper.

    Electromagnetic noise is emitted everywhere that humans use electronic devices. The observations from the Oldenburg study suggest that birds utilize a biological system that is sensitive to manmade electromagnetic noise with intensities well below the guidelines for human exposure adopted by the World Health Organization.

    But why is DARPA studying bird migration? According to Dr. Matt Goodman, the Program Manager for QuBE, one reason is that the observed phenomena might have their roots in quantum physics.

    “Nature is an extraordinary testbed. We think it’s possible that over millions of years of evolution, biological organisms have developed systems that exploit quantum physics,” Goodman said. “The QuBE program is designed to test this hypothesis. The work we’re pursuing questions fundamental assumptions about how biological processes work.”

    If manifestly quantum effects are shown to be at play in biological systems, and scientists can understand the mechanisms at work, the findings could lead to fundamentally new technologies, including bio-inspired sensors. In addition to exploring magnetic navigation, QuBE researchers are also studying photosynthesis, olfaction, and the underlying theoretical framework needed to link biology and quantum phenomena.

    “The time and cost to develop many of the traditional sensors that the Department of Defense uses is substantial. Nature, on the other hand, has already evolved extraordinary capabilities—think of a dog’s sense of smell,” Goodman explained. “In addition to being extremely capable, natural sensors are also robust, durable, exhibit great sensitivity and enormous selectivity, and are produced amid the dirt and dust of the natural world; nature doesn’t need clean rooms. We’re hoping to follow nature’s lead to capture those qualities in manmade sensor systems.”

    http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2014/05/09.aspx

  9. http://time.com/golden-cage/ video link to EHS movie.

    Finally, after 2.5 years of work this video on which I worked with my friend, the photojournalist Nadav Neuhaus came out. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first EHS is in the US mainstream media:

    http://ehsfighback.blogspot.com/2014/05/time-magazing-movie-on-ehs-search-for.html

    We hope that this breakthrough into mainstream US media will be followed and continued.

    I conditioned working on this video that the “other side” would not get to respond. However, while in the video we were successful in achieving it, without our knowledge, Time added an article full of inaccuracies and which unfortunately repeats the false slogans which have been implemented by the industry and on which even many scientists who are allegedly on our side repeat, not because they are true but because they do no bother to learn the topic.

    Nevertheless we are happy with the result.

    I added a DONATE option to my blog. In the past couple of years I have been working non stop on the Israeli Supreme Court Wii-Fi case which I finance, on bringing the issue to the media in Israel and in the US and this movie is another fruit of these efforts. However this work exhausted my financial resources. I hope that you will help me to continue and do this work by donating.

    EHS Fight Back will continue and fight to ensure that this topic will no longer be ignored.

    Thank you,

    Dafna

  10. Barrie Trower
    September 2013
    With Deference to all Scientists: this Research Report has been written for all students and non-scientists to understand.
    Wi-Fi –
    A Thalidomide in the Making.
    Who Cares?

    EXCERPTS:

    Abstract
    As stated by University Researchers, Government Scientists and International Scientific Advisors; a minimum of 57.7% of schoolgirls exposed to low-level microwave radiation (Wi-fi) are at risk of suffering stillbirth, fetal abnormalities or genetically damaged children, when they give birth. Any genetic damage may pass to successive generations.

    ——————————————————

    Wifi – a Thalidomide in the Making – Who Cares?
    Professor John R Goldsmith, International / Advisor Consultant for R.F. Communication, Epidemiology and Communications Sciences Advisor to the World Health Organisation, Military and University Advisor, Researcher; wrote concerning the low level exposure of microwave irradiation (below thermal level) incident upon women:
    “Of the microwave-exposed women, 47.7% had miscarriages prior to the 7th week of pregnancy….”(1)
    The level of irradiation incident upon the women was stated, as from, five microwatts per centimetre squared. This level of irradiation may seem meaningless to a non-scientist; however, when I say that it is below what most schoolgirls will receive in a classroom of wi-fi transmitters, from the age of approximately five years upwards, this level becomes more meaningful.

    Simple Explanation
    Imagine you are five years old, in school and sitting with a wi-fi laptop near your abdomen. Theoretically, your ovaries can become irradiated until you leave school at aged 16-18 years old. When you become pregnant, every one of your follicles (to become eggs) will have been microwaved. Hence, you may or may not deliver a healthy child.
    Should you become a pregnant as a student, your embryo (for its first 100 days – if it is female) is producing approximately 400,000 follicles (within its ovaries) for future child-birth.
    The problem is that these developing follicle cells do not have the cellular protection of mature adult cells. Consequently your ‘Grandchild’ may have had every single follicle cell irradiated and damaged prior to its conception. Therefore when your child becomes an adult (with its irradiated follicles) there is a greater likelihood of its child (your Grand-daughter) suffering the ailments previously mentioned, during conception / embryonic and foetal development stages.

    Beyond Belief
    The shocking truth is, not only was all of this known and documented long before wi-fi was ever put in front of children, but the dangerous biological effects were concealed (as they are to this day) from the general public, in order to protect the industries profit.

    Professor Goldsmith writes:
    “…..effects from exposure to RF radiation in certain populations: reproductive effects…..increased spontaneous abortion…..increased incidence of childhood and other cancers…..” (1)

  11. Most people who are aware about wireless and smart meter dangers are in the minority. I discovered at my local Coop market last week, two wireless meters on the building. I spoke to the manager and ask if he ever heard of Smart meters? He said, NO. I gave him some links to research this. He said he would do so. This is the challenge we face. The majority are clueless to the dangers of smart meters. This is my generation who started the concept of food coops. Volunteer/based, healthy food discounted to members. Members who comprise essentially those who are environmentally and good quality food conscious. Where are the members and volunteers these days? Why was there not a conversation at the store about smart meters and the importance of removing them?

    Perhaps my generation doesn’t read anymore or they just don’t care. A little of both, because there have been articles in the local papers, some I wrote, hoping to influence awareness surrounding the smart meter issues. I have also shared this information, personally with individuals whom I was positive would become passioniate about, but I was wrong on both counts. We are in serious trouble here. What is it going to take to turn this around because educating the public is not working. At this pace millions will suffer and die.

    Am I to assume that this is how little the general public including those who you would assume keep up on these type of issues, including wireless and wifi or has our culture totally bought into the wireless technology because of its convenience. Next time I stop in to shop I will have to check if they have a microwave in the deli.

  12. Electricity is a product. If the product is not safe, is a violation of our privacy, is not healthy and is proven to cause harm; then its seems that we, the people have a viable class action suit against our utility companies across the board. The produce of electricity is “dirty” it is not clean. The utility companies are causing severe illness and disease to its customers. Now with the AMI smart metering this will include gas and water as well. it is will include all devices and products, vendors and subcontractors contributing to the infrastructure of the Smart Grid. Why are we waiting for them to set the terms and direction? The only thing investors/industry and government react to is money and the danger of losing it. They do not care about your health. They don’t care about the damage this technology is doing to us. All they understand is the bottom line. Many believe it is the military behind this. If we continue to sit back and wait for something to happen we will fail and our rights and freedoms will not be regained.

    full article at:

    http://www.out-law.com/topics/commercial/supply-of-goods-and-services/product-liability-under-the-consumer-protection-act/

  13. Apr302014

    A must read new book about Electromagnetic Radiation, “An Electronic Silent Spring” (Page 149 – author gave me space to talk about the noise pollution, how the Regulatory agencies are ignoring citizen’s complaints and the need to investigate the Noise radiation pollution plaguing thousands, millions of people exposed to the Grid.
    A MUST READ BOOK, AUTHOR, KATIE SINGER

    “An Electronic Silent Spring”-Facing the Dangers and Creating Safe Limits

    Forward by Frank Clegg, former President of Microsoft Canada, founding CEO of Canadians for Safe Technology–

    “This book shows how radiation emitted by electronic devices can cause biological harm. It describes how to reduce our emissions and exposure. These issues matter to anyone who uses technology. Therefore, everyone should read this book”
    Katie was kind and generous in allowing me space to talk about the “Pure Tone” noise as she recognizes this noise pollution as part of the radiation issues caused by the Automated metering infrastructure and so inappropriately named by industry as the “Smart Grid”
    __________________________________________________

    The consequences of undervaluing or misjudging the biological effects of long-term, low-level exposure (to electromagnetic radiation emanating from radar, television, communications systems, microwave ovens, industrial heat-treatment systems, and many other sources) could become a critical problem for the public health, especially if genetic effects are involved……

    …from “Program for Control of Electromagnetic Pollution of the Environment,” authored by The Electromagnetic Radiation Management Advisory Council, issued by The President’s Office of Tele-Council, issued by The President’s Office of Telecommunications Policy in 1971

    http://www.amazon.com/Katie-Singer/e/B001K8KUCE

    F.Y.I. Katie was kind and generous to give me a space in the book to speak about the Noise radiation emissions coming from the Automated metering infrastructure the industry so inappropriately named “Smart Grid”.

  14. The report concluded that the plaintiffs were suffering an acute susceptibility to low frequency noise (LFN) emissions emanating from the Santee Cooper substation.
    “Your symptoms are temporally consistent with construction and operation of the substation,” Bennett’s report states. “It is my opinion, to a reasonable degree of scientific certitude, the LFN emissions from the Santee Cooper Substation are the source of your psycho physiological health problems.”

    Myrtle Beach area couple’s suit says Santee Cooper substation caused medical issues
    http://www.myhorrynews.com/news/local/carolina_forest/article_64dcba44-c416-11e3-9b6d-001a4bcf6878.html

    Lawsuit over Santee Cooper substation in Carolina Forest moves to federal court
    http://www.myhorrynews.com/news/local/carolina_forest/article_dc1b939c-ca55-11e3-9b17-0017a43b2370.html

  15. 16 April 2014

    Mr. Stefan Schreck
    Mr. Ladislav Miko
    Mr. Robert Vanhoorde
    Mr. Michael Walsh
    SANCO.DDG2.03
    Via email: SANCO-C2- SCENIHR@ec.europa.eu (Scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks – SCENHIR 2013 report)

    Re: Preliminary Opinion on Potential Health Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)BY

    Gentlemen,

    The BioInitiative Working Group has reviewed the Preliminary Opinion on Potential Health Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) dated November 29, 2013. We submit the following comments and suggested revisions. Thank you for providing this opportunity for comment. We hope these suggested revisions will be incorporated in the Final Opinion.

    OVERALL COMMENTS

    1. This Preliminary Opinion is an inadequate basis for updating the 2009 EU opinion on ‘Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)’ and should be sent back for major revisions. The conclusions drawn from the data presented are unreliable for judging possible health risks.

    2. The Committee has not answered the question it was appointed to investigate. There is no conclusion in the Executive Summary on whether the Committee determined that possible health effects of EMF are established for childhood leukemia and exist for genotoxicity, for neurological effects, for brain tumors, male fertility, fetal and neonatal effects or other key areas of research. The title of the Opinion is ‘Preliminary Opinion on Possible Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) on Human Health” (emphasis added). The Committee has given an answer to a different question, limiting its conclusions to whether certainty or causal effect is established. This was also the central failing of the SCENIHR 2009 Opinion on EMF. This Opinion is better titled “Preliminary Opinion on Scientific Certainty of Health Harm from Electromagnetic Fields (EMF).

    3. The Opinion should be revised to clearly state whether the evidence supports a finding of possible risk for each type of evidence considered (each section). This report is not useful for the purpose intended due to the ambiguous basis for judging the sufficiency of the scientific evidence, which will eventually form a basis for concluding whether changes in the ICNIRP standards are warranted. The lack of a clear statement about the basis for judging what constitutes sufficient evidence of “Possible Effects”, and the embedded up-shifting language to instead require a demonstration of ‘conclusive or unequivocal evidence’ (Exhibit A).

    4.The possible medical applications of ELF EMF should be given more attention. Several studies indicate that ELF EMF could enhance recovery of functions after nervous system damage and have protective effects against development of neurodegenerative diseases. Cuccurazzu et al. (2010) reported an ELF EMF-induced neurogenesis and repair of the nervous system after damage. Kumar et al. (2010) and Das et al. (2012) showed an enhanced restoration of functions after spinal injury in the rat. Kumar et al. (2013) further showed that ELF EMF exposure restored spinal cord injury-induced tonic pain and changes in neurotransmitter concentrations in the brain of the rat. Maestú et al. (2013) reported improvement in pain sensation in fibromyalgia patients after magnetic field stimulation. A possible beneficial effect on cerebral ischemia has been reported by Rauš Balind et al. (2014). Piacentini et al. (2008) reported a promotion of neural differentiation by ELF EMF. Kim et al. (2013) and Bai et al. (2013) reported stimulation by ELF EMF on neural differentiation of stem cells. Effects on stem cells and hippocampal neurogenesis also have been reported by Podda et al. (2013) and Leone et al. (2014). Protective effects of ELF EMF have been reported by Raus et al (2012a, b) after cerebral ischemia, Tassel et al. (2012a, b) on the development of Huntington’s Disease, and Manjhi et al. (2013) on spinal cord injury induced osteoporosis. Furthermore, Cvetkovic et al. (2009) reported alteration of EEG by application of certain frequencies of magnetic fields. This may be useful in the treatment of certain neurological disorders such as sleep and psychiatric disorders. Static magnetic field has been shown by Wang et al. (2010) to act like an anti-Parkinson drug. Static magnetic field also has been shown to have antiangiogenesis property (Wang Z, Yang P, Xu H, Qian A, Hu L, Shang P. Inhibitory effects of a gradient static magnetic field on normal angiogenesis. Bioelectromagnetics. 30(6):446-453, 2009), which can be translated into an anticancer activity. Use of ELF EMF for cancer treatment has been extensively investigated. There is a study showed that pulsed electromagnetic fields turned on adenosine receptors in brain cancer cells that inhibit cancer growth (Vincenzi F, Targa M, Corciulo C, Gessi S, Merighi S, Setti S, Cadossi R, Borea PA, Varani K. The anti-tumor effect of A3 adenosine receptors is potentiated by pulsed electromagnetic fields in cultured neural cancer cells. PLoS One 7(6):e39317, 2012). Interesting, this effect was not observed when normal brain cells were exposed to magnetic field. The waveform of the fields may play an important role in the effect produced. There are several studies on pulsed (instead of sinusoidal) magnetic fields (Aldinucci et al., 2009; Capone et al., 2009; Cook et al. 2009; Glover et al., 2009) and complex fields (Ross et al., 2008). It has been speculated that intermittent EMF or fields that have a transient nature could be more biologically potent than constant fields. The conditions and parameters of the fields that could produce either detrimental or beneficial effects need further investigation. Furthermore, it is still not clear whether acute (one time) exposure would elicit effects different from chronic/repeated exposure. In the 2007-2012 literature, there are many studies investigated the effects of chronic/repeated exposure. The study by Liu et al. (2008a) indicates that duration of exposure could be an important factor.

    5.The majority of the studies used magnetic fields above 0.1 mT (1 gauss; the highest was 8 mT). The intensities are much higher than those in the public environment. Thus, caution should be taken in extrapolating the high-intensity cell and animal studies to environmental human exposure situation. Exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 T (0.0004 mT) has been implication in an increased risk of childhood leukemia. And, the recent report by Li et al. (Li DK, Ferber JR, Odouli R, Quesenberry CP Jr. A Prospective Study of In-utero Exposure to Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Childhood Obesity. Sci Rep. 2:540, 2012) on an increased risk of obesity of humans exposed prenatally to magnetic field at 0.25 T (0.00025 mT). There is also a report of a blood pressure lowering effect in humans with mild-to-moderate hypertension after exposure to magnetic fields at 1 μT (0.001mT) (Nishimura T, Tada H, Guo X, Murayama T, Teramukai S, Okano H, Yamada J, Mohri K, Fukushima M. A 1-μT extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field vs. sham control for mild-to-moderate hypertension: a double-blind, randomized study. Hypertens Res. 34(3):372-377, 2011.) Apparently, humans are sensitive to magnetic field at level less than 1 T. There are a study by Ross et al (2008) showing ‘perception’ alternation in human subjects exposed to magnetic field at 10 nT (0.00001 mT), a study by Fournier et al (2012) on effect of brain development in the rat at 30 nT (0.00003 mT), and a study by Stevens (2007) indicating changes in emotional states in humans exposed to 8-12 Hz magnetic field at 5 T (0.005 mT). These data do suggest magnetic fields at very low intensities could cause neurological effects in humans. In the 1990s, there was a series of more than 20 studies published by Reuven Sandyk showing that pulsed magnetic fields at pT (1 pT = 0.000000001 mT) levels could have therapeutic effects on Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis (see e.g., Sandyk R. Reversal of cognitive impairment in an elderly Parkinsonian patient by transcranial application of picotesla electromagnetic fields. Int J Neurosci. 91(1-2):57-68, 1997, or, search for ‘Sandyk R’ in the PubMed.) However, Sandyk’s findings have never been independently confirmed.

    6.In summary, both RF and ELF EMF affect neurological functions and behavior in animals and humans. There is no definite data showing that these effects are detrimental to human health. However, since effects have been observed, it is advisable that one should limit one’s exposure to EMF.

    READ FULL REPORT AT: http://www.bioinitiative.org/whats-new-2/

  16. Published on Feb 26, 2014

    Martin Blank is an expert on the health-related effects of electromagnetic fields and has been studying the subject for over thirty years. He earned his first PhD from Columbia University in physical chemistry and his second from the University of Cambridge in colloid science. From 1968 to 2011, he taught as an Associate Professor at Columbia University, where he now acts as a special lecturer. He has published over 200 papers and reviews.

    Dr Blank is the author of “Overpowered: What Science Tells Us About The Dangers of Cell Phones And Other WiFi-Age Devices”

  17. Energy giant faces prosecution over noise from new power line

    David Ross

    Highland Correspondent.

    Thursday 6 February 2014

    AN energy firm has been warned it faces prosecution unless it stops an loud industrial humming noise coming from a substation at the end of a controversial power line.

    CONTROVERSIAL: Residents said construction of the 137-mile power line had caused problems and the hum can be heard for miles. Picture: Steve Cox
    CONTROVERSIAL: Residents said construction of the 137-mile power line had caused problems and the hum can be heard for miles. Picture: Steve Cox

    SSE has been given six months by Highland Council to sort the problem at the station at the northern end of the new Beauly-Denny line or it will face legal action.

    The sound emanating from the electrical base is deemed to ­constitute a “statutory nuisance” leading the council to issue a noise abatement notice under a law often used against noisy neighbours.

    It follows complaints over many months from people living near the substation at the Beauly end of the 137-mile transmission line. They say the noise can be heard several miles away, and seriously affects everyday life.

    Failure to comply with the terms of notice without reasonable excuse may result in prosecution in a sheriff court, under part three of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

    SSE says it is disappointed the Highland Council felt it necessary to threaten legal action, as it insists a significant amount of progress has been made and there is now a programme in place to resolve what was a complex issue.

    However, Stephen Byford, chairman of Kilmorack Community Council, said: “It has been going on for a year now.

    “We had already been suffering the effects of the Beauly-Denny upgrade and we shouldn’t have had to put up with this as well.”

    He said one particular piece of equipment had been found to be responsible, a Static Var Compensator (SVC), a transformer that stabilised the voltage going down the line.

    Repeated complaints had been made to SSE and the council.

    Mr Byford said: “This thing hums creating a tonal noise which everybody in the area, even several miles away, can hear. I live a mile and a half away up on the braes above the substation and I regularly hear the noise, especially when you have a still night and are trying to sleep.
    “All last summer we weren’t able to sit in our gardens and relax because of the noise. There are about 1500 people here who are affected, but some in the neighbouring Kiltarlity parish are as well.”

    He said he had a colleague who lived three and a half miles away who could hear it occasionally.

    Councillor Graham Phillips, chairman of Highland Council’s Transport, Environmental and Community Services Committee, said the council appreciated the ongoing patience of the residents “as this complex investigation progresses to the next stage”.

    Alan Yates, Highland Council’s environmental health manager, said: “Our officers have reached the stage of the investigation where they feel it is appropriate to serve an abatement notice to ensure the nuisance is resolved and to provide some reassurance to local residents.”

    He said the notice would give SSE six months, which was reasonable given the complexities of finding and implementing suitable solutions for a live substation of that size.

    Alastair Brand, SSE’s ­Beauly-Denny Project Director, said: “We are taking this matter extremely seriously and are disappointed that the Highland Council has felt it necessary to serve a noise abatement notice as we have been working closely with the council and the local community to address their concerns.

    “We have made a significant amount of progress and there is now a programme in place to resolve the issue.”

    He said expert consultants had been appointed. SSE might also have to seek permission from National Grid to switch off some equipment in order to allow work to be carried out safely.

    http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/energy-giant-faces-prosecution-over-noise-from-new-power-line.23358511

  18. U.S. autism rate surges, CDC reports
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2014/03/27/u-s-autism-rate-surges-cdc-reports/?tid=pm_national_pop
    The number of U.S. children with autism has surged to one in 68, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Thursday, a 30 percent increase since the agency estimated just two years ago that one child in 88 suffered from the disorder.
    The new estimate, based on a review of records in 2010 for eight year olds in 11 states, also showed a marked increase in the number of children with higher IQs who fall somewhere on the autism spectrum, and a wide range of results depending on where a child lives. Only one child in 175 was diagnosed with autism in Alabama, while one in 45 was found to have the disorder in New Jersey.

    “Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a Pathophysiological Link – Part I” http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928468013000370

    Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a pathophysiological link – Part I Martha R. Herbert a,∗, Cindy Sage b
    a TRANSCEND Research Program Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA b Sage Associates, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
    Received 10 February 2013; received in revised form 6 May 2013; accepted 15 July 2013
    Abstract
    Although autism spectrum conditions (ASCs) are defined behaviorally, they also involve multileveled disturbances of underlying biology that find striking parallels in the physiological impacts of electromagnetic frequency and radiofrequency exposures (EMF/RFR). Part I of this paper will review the critical contributions pathophysiology may make to the etiology, pathogenesis and ongoing generation of core features of ASCs. We will review pathophysiological damage to core cellular processes that are associated both with ASCs and with biological effects of EMF/RFR exposures that contribute to chronically disrupted homeostasis. Many studies of people with ASCs have identified oxidative stress and evidence of free radical damage, cellular stress proteins, and deficiencies of antioxidants such as glutathione. Elevated intracellular calcium in ASCs may be due to genetics or may be downstream of inflammation or environmental exposures. Cell membrane lipids may be peroxidized, mitochondria may be dysfunctional, and various kinds of immune system disturbances are common. Brain oxidative stress and inflammation as well as measures consistent with blood–brain barrier and brain perfusion compromise have been documented. Part II of this paper will review how behaviors in ASCs may emerge from alterations of electrophysiological oscillatory synchronization, how EMF/RFR could contribute to these by de-tuning the organism, and policy implications of these vulnerabilities. Changes in brain and autonomic nervous system electrophysiological function and sensory processing predominate, seizures are common, and sleep disruption is close to universal. All of these phenomena also occur with EMF/RFR exposure that can add to system overload (‘allostatic load’) in ASCs by increasing risk, and worsening challenging biological problems and symptoms; conversely, reducing exposure might ameliorate symptoms of ASCs by reducing obstruction of physiological repair. Various vital but vulnerable mechanisms such as calcium channels may be disrupted by environmental agents, various genes associated with autism or the interaction of both. With dramatic increases in reported ASCs that are coincident in time with the deployment of wireless technologies, we need aggressive investigation of potential ASC – EMF/RFR links. The evidence is sufficient to warrant new public exposure standards benchmarked to low-intensity (non-thermal) exposure levels now known to be biologically disruptive, and strong, interim precautionary practices are advocated. © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Keywords: Autism; EMF/RFR; Cellular stress; Oxidative stress; Mitochondrial dysfunction; Oscillatory synchronization; Environment; Radiofrequency; Wireless; Children; Fetus

    “Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a Pathophysiological Link part II” http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928468013000382)

    Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a pathophysiological link part II Martha R. Herbert a,∗, Cindy Sage b
    a Massachussetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston, TRANSCEND Research Program Neurology, Boston, MA, USA b Sage Associates, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
    Abstract
    Autism spectrum conditions (ASCs) are defined behaviorally, but they also involve multileveled disturbances of underlying biology that find striking parallels in the physiological impacts of electromagnetic frequency and radiofrequency radiation exposures (EMF/RFR). Part I (Vol 776) of this paper reviewed the critical contributions pathophysiology may make to the etiology, pathogenesis and ongoing generation of behaviors currently defined as being core features of ASCs. We reviewed pathophysiological damage to core cellular processes that are associated both with ASCs and with biological effects of EMF/RFR exposures that contribute to chronically disrupted homeostasis. Many studies of people with ASCs have identified oxidative stress and evidence of free radical damage, cellular stress proteins, and deficiencies of antioxidants such as glutathione. Elevated intracellular calcium in ASCs may be due to genetics or may be downstream of inflammation or environmental exposures. Cell membrane lipids may be peroxidized, mitochondria may be dysfunctional, and various kinds of immune system disturbances are common. Brain oxidative stress and inflammation as well as measures consistent with blood–brain barrier and brain perfusion compromise have been documented. Part II of this paper documents how behaviors in ASCs may emerge from alterations of electrophysiological oscillatory synchronization, how EMF/RFR could contribute to these by de-tuning the organism, and policy implications of these vulnerabilities. It details evidence for mitochondrial dysfunction, immune system dysregulation, neuroinflammation and brain blood flow alterations, altered electrophysiology, disruption of electromagnetic signaling, synchrony, and sensory processing, de-tuning of the brain and organism, with autistic behaviors as emergent properties emanating from this pathophysiology. Changes in brain and autonomic nervous system electrophysiological function and sensory processing predominate, seizures are common, and sleep disruption is close to universal. All of these phenomena also occur with EMF/RFR exposure that can add to system overload (‘allostatic load’) in ASCs by increasing risk, and can worsen challenging biological problems and symptoms; conversely, reducing exposure might ameliorate symptoms of ASCs by reducing obstruction of physiological repair. Various vital but vulnerable mechanisms such as calcium channels may be disrupted by environmental agents, various genes associated with autism or the interaction of both. With dramatic increases in reported ASCs that are coincident in time with the deployment of wireless technologies, we need aggressive investigation of potential ASC—EMF/RFR links. The evidence is sufficient to warrant new public exposure standards benchmarked to low-intensity (non-thermal) exposure levels now known to be biologically disruptive, and strong, interim precautionary practices are advocated. © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Keywords: Autism; EMF/RFR; Cellular stress; Oxidative stress; Mitochondrial dysfunction; Oscillatory synchronization; Environment; Radiofrequency; Wireless; Children; Fetus; Microwave

  19. WHY ARE WE BEING IGNORED LIKE NOTHING IS HAPPENING TO US? So many unanswered questions that makes you beg to wonder……

    “Hearers” of the EMR (electromagnetic radiation) pollution aptly coined, “Smart Grid Syndrome” which includes those who are being harmed physically as well, are being dismissed and ignored by our Government. We have proven the noise pollution is real and in our air 24 hours a day. The medical profession has acknowledged EHS is a disability caused by the environmental exposure to EMR. So why is nothing being done to stop this proliferation upon all living things? Why do we present all the evidence, experts, victims and the soldiers whom represent government and our pseudo advocacy, exhibit by their words and actions no intention of stopping this death machine that is destroying humans and wildlife? Who are we trying to convince? Why aren’t they worried about their kids and loved ones as well? They are looking at the same studies, listening to the same sufferers, but yet they twist the truth to suit their agenda. We have nothing to gain and everything to lose and I speak in the present tense that the harm is happening now and not something projected into the future. It is only going to be more devastating the longer the majority waits and does nothing.
    I saw a news story on the Today Show about Alzheimer’s. The government acknowledges their concern for Alzheimer’s. With 5% of the global population inflicted by this disease; costing our government 1 trillion dollars a year for care. Ignorance and misinformation about “hearer” sufferers is an excuse to ignore and dismiss the problem; minimizing the fact that 5% of the population worldwide is inflicted! This is not so minimal when you do the math. It is over 35 million victims being ignored and dismissed. Same percentage as people with Alzheimer’s. Our disadvantage is that we can’t forget and that we are suffering physically and emotionally, daily, by the EMR pollution. We can’t forget that we are acoustically being traumatized without relief, 24 hours a day in our homes, workplaces, schools etc. Why is the government and medical community ignorant and unyielding? Why do they try to discredit victims by categorizing them as mentally unstable when science and evidence says otherwise? The sickness and disability will cost the tax payers another trillion dollars to care for those injured by EMR pollution. Alzheimer’s has been linked to electro pollution as well.
    EMR is holding over 35 million victims captive and many more will be impacted by the constant exposure and accumulative effect of the polluted environment people have no choice but to live in.

    The AMI (automated metering infrastructure) they so wrongly and arrogantly named the Smart Grid is a military grade weapon directed where it is turned on at everyone exposed . Using pulsed RF frequencies proven by the military to be biologically harmful. Why then are we using this military weapon grade technology?
    The machine proliferating the modernization of the global grid using frequencies that potentially harm humans and wildlife is not a random thoughtless act. It is intentional and done with knowledge of the dangers this presents. Why then, is this being rolled out like a military take over of our towns, schools, cities infiltrating and polluting our environments with deadly pulsed signals penetrating our brains and body 24 hours a day. Nonstop. The transmission is always on even during a power outage. You cannot protect yourself or your family. You can’t move to escape. You can’t shield to escape. You cannot question or complain because it will not be taken seriously.

    Why does the Government want to make people sick? Why do they want to pulse RF signals through the power lines into our homes? Why do they ignore the harm it is doing to our wildlife? The H.ES.E. report studies detail the harm it is doing to our birds, bats, fish and honeybees.

    It is time for you to look around you ask yourself these questions. There is nothing polite or benign about the governments’ intentions here. They are not naïve; as many would like to believe. We are only privy to what they want us to know or what is not in their absolute power to censor.

    We have the truth because regardless of all the static surrounding what is proven or not proven; the government cannot hide the truth of what people are going through. I want to call you every expletive known to man; to display the loathing and disgust I feel for an entity who is a collective coward, who is the lowest of life form. Show your ugly presence, so we can fight on even ground. We know it is not President Obama!

    Who are we fighting? Why are you afraid of the truth?

  20. cantonakos1@gmail.com,

  21. Electromagnetic Noise, the Invisible Pollution
    Authored by Dennis Roberson Vice Provost and Research Professor Illinois Institute of Technology
    Last Updated: 12:00 5 April 2004

    Summary:
    This white paper has presented a potentially severe problem which may inflict increasing damage to our wireless infrastructure in terms of the dramatic reduction in both the quality and availability of capabilities and services, and in terms of the unanticipated expense to attempt to remedy this decline. Given the fact that this infrastructure increasingly affects all aspects of our daily lives, from public safety and emergency services, to medical care, to education, communications, and pleasure, the threat represented in the paper may have dramatic, wide spread human impact. To address these issues the paper proposes a broad based research agenda to be pursued in multiple research centers across the United States and potentially the world to first understand the nature and extent of the current issues, and specifically the rate of increase in the electromagnetic noise floor and related interference temperature. It is hoped that through the pursuit of this agenda, the current noise pollution issue will be fully understood enabling appropriate actions to be taken to both preserve and enhance our wireless infrastructure thereby enhancing the quality of life for the peoples of this planet for years to come.

  22. To:
    President of the United States
    U.S. Senate
    U.S. House of Representatives

    HALT THE EMR NOISE POLLUTION HARMING
    HUMANS AND WILDLIFE
    April 1, 2014

    I am signing this petition because I am adversely affected by the Global AMI (automated metering infrastructure) for the following reason(s):
    1. I hear the ongoing noise pollution 24/7 causing deleterious effects.
    2. I am experiencing physical symptoms impacting my daily life and ability to function in my daily life. http://www.epa.gov/air/noise.html
    3. and/or I do not want to be exposed to harmful, unhealthy, EMR (electro-magnetic radiation) pollution. I demand my government to halt these emissions immediately and mitigate the public Health hazard causing deliberate illness and increased mortality to humans and wildlife.

    To Read full letter and sign:

    https://www.change.org/petitions/president-of-the-united-states-halt-the-emr-noise-pollution-harming-humans-and-wildlife

  23. Published on Jan 11, 2014

    Mobiles ‘cooking the brain’; brain tumors become children’s number one killer illness; and leaked industry memo admits ‘wargaming’ the science. Seek truth from facts with former senior White House adviser Devra Davis, Storyleak editor Anthony Gucciardi, ‘cell phone survivor’ Bret Bocook, Microwave News editor Louis Slesin, top radiation biologist Dariusz Leszczynski, and Ellie Marks, whose husband Alan’s suing the industry for his brain tumor.

  24. IS NATIONAL GRID, AN INTERNATIONAL DELIVERY COMPANY’S CONDUCT A TERRORIST ACT OR AN INFRINGEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAWS?
    There may be something in the international trade laws exposing an international company such as National Grid to “acts of terrorism”, by selling a product that is harming Americans wildlife. All affiliates, sub contractors, vendors would be subject to violation of the same laws. So what is our own Government guilty of, since they are providing the stimulus money, funding the AMI infrastructure, aka “smart grid” which emissions are radiating “Dirty Electricity”, exceeding FCC radiation limits, causing suffering and chronic illnesses and death of Humans, animals and wildlife as result. The negligence whether intentional or not is a crime.

    Excerpt from link below:

    National Grid is an international energy delivery company. In the U.S., National Grid delivers electricity to approximately 3.3 million customers in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Rhode Island, and manages the electricity network on Long Island under an agreement with the Long Island Power Authority (LIPA). It is the largest distributor of natural gas in the northeastern U.S., serving approximately 3.4 million customers in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Rhode Island. National Grid also owns over 4,000 megawatts of contracted electricity generation that provides power to over one million LIPA customers.

    http://www.nationalgridus.com/aboutus/a3-1_news2.asp?document=4657

  25. Swiss teleco acknowledges RF dangers in 2003 patent application

    April 1, 2014 in -Mailing List, Cell phone news, Cell Phone Towers by EMFacts.

    http://www.emfacts.com/2014/04/swiss-teleco-acknowledges-rf-dangers-in-2003-patent-application/

    The below document was discovered by New Zealand Lawyer Sue Grey during a document search. I do not have a url for the document yet but can subscribers send Sue’s document if requested.

    Sue Grey states: Possibly a good invention but look what Swisscom (a Swiss Telco) admits in terms of the biological and genotoxic effects of RF EMR (at least to the patents office, if not to the public generally).

    Here’s a translation of a Swiss Telecom patient application for an invention to reduce radiation levels. It dates from 2003.

    Pub. No.: WO/2004/075583 International Application No.: PCT/CH2003/000138
    Publication Date: 02.09.2004 International Filing Date: 24.02.2003
    Chapter 2 Demand Filed: 24.09.2004
    IPC:
    H04W 52/02 (2009.01), H04W 88/08 (2009.01)

    Reduction of Electrosmog in Wireless Local Networks

    This invention relates to a method and system for reduction of electrosmog in wireless local area networks (WLAN), one or more mobile network units communicating with a base station by means of radio frequency signals in a wireless local area network, which base station amplifies the radio frequency signals of the mobile network unit and/or connects the wireless local area network to a wired fixed network by means of bridge functions. In particular, the invention relates to a method and system in which a WLAN comprises a plurality of access points with differing transmission cells.

    The influence of electrosmog on the human body is a known problem. The health risk from mobile radio transmitters, handys and DECT telephones has been an explosive subject among the general public at least since the enormous breakthrough in mobile radio technology in the 1990s. To meet the concerns of science from the legislative side, the permissible limit values have thus been lowered several times, and technology has been increasingly focused on this problem. The risk of damage to health through electrosmog has also become better understood as a result of more recent and improved studies. When, for example, human blood cells are irradiated with electromagnetic fields, clear damage to hereditary material has been demonstrated and there have been indications of an increased cancer risk (
    Thus it has been possible to show that mobile radio radiation can cause damage to genetic material, in particular in human white blood cells, whereby both the DNA itself is damaged and the number of chromosomes changed. This mutation can consequently lead to increased cancer risk. In particular, it could also be shown that this destruction is not dependent upon temperature increases, i.e. is non-thermal. Based on the scientific studies in the field, and owing to increasing pressure from the public, especially in the industrialized countries, epidemiological studies have been systematized by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the last few years, such as e.g. the currently running WHO Interphone Project, in order to be able to assess more precisely the health risks from electrosmog and work out corresponding guidelines.

    Read full document at:
    http://www.emfacts.com/2014/04/swiss-teleco-acknowledges-rf-dangers-in-2003-patent-application/

  26. Major insurance firm, Swiss Re, warns of large losses from “unforeseen consequences” of electromagnetic frequencies
    31 March 2014 at 7:55pm |

    A leading Fortune 500 insurance firm has warned the industry that “unforeseen consequences of electromagnetic fields” could lead to a raft of claims and significant liability losses.

    View the Swiss Re SONAR Report (PDF)
    Big telecom and Big utilities have a joint venture of convincing the world that low-level chronic microwave radiation exposure is safe – even when thousands of independent peer-reviewed studies say it is not.

    In its SONAR Emerging Risks report, 2013, which covers risks that could “impact the insurance industry in the future”, the Emerging Risks team at Swiss Re categorises the impact of health claims related to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) as “high”. It acknowledges recent reports of courts ruling in favour of claimants who have experienced health damage from mobile phones, and also says that anxiety over risks related to EMFs is “on the rise”.

    The document states that whilst the majority of the topics covered in its pages were of “medium impact”, health issues associated with EMFs sit in the highest impact category. Other topics discussed include the dangers of cyber attacks, power blackouts, workplace safety and Big Data – all of which are exacerbated and/or added to by the ill-conceived “smart” metering programmes.

    Swiss Re, the reinsurance firm behind the report, defines Emerging Risks as “newly developing or changing risks that are difficult to quantify and could have a major impact on society and insurance industry”. By placing EMFs in the “High” potential impact-zone, it is suggesting that there may be potentially “high financial, reputational and/or regulatory impacts or significant stakeholder concern” in the next 10 years or more.

    http://www.takebackyourpower.net/news/2014/03/31/major-insurance-firm-swiss-re-warns-of-large-losses-from-unforeseen-consequences-of-wireless-technologies/

    • Swiss Re SONAR Emerging risk insights

      Unforeseen consequences of electromagnetic fieldsThe ubiquity of electromagnetic fields (EMF) raises concerns about 
      potential implications for human health, in particular with regard to the use of mobile phones, power lines or antennas for broadcasting. Over
       the last decade, the spread of wireless devices has accelerated 
      enormously. The convergence of mobile phones with  computer technology has led to the proliferation of new and emerging
       technologies. This development has increased exposure to electromagnetic fields, the health impacts  of which remain unknown.
      Anxiety over the potential risks related to EMF has risen. Studies are difficult to conduct, since time trend studies are inconsistent due to the still rather recent proliferation of wireless technology. The WHO has classified extremely low frequency magnetic fields and radiofrequency
       electromagnetic fields, such as radition emitted by cell phones, as  potentially carcinogenic to humans (Class 2B carcinogen). Furthermore, a recent ruling by an Italian court suggested a link between mobile phone radiation and human health impairment. Overall, however, 
      scientific studies are still inconclusive regarding possible adverse 
      health effects of EMF.If a direct link between EMF and human health
       problems were established, it would open doors for new claims and 
      could ultimately lead to large losses under product  liability covers. Liability rates would likely rise.

      Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd
      Mythenquai 50/60 P.O. Box 8022 
      Zurich Switzerland

      Telephone +41 43 285 2121 Fax +41 43 285 2999
      http://www.swissre.com

  27. DESIGN OF DOMESTIC POWER LINE CARRIER COMMUNICATION MHM Rikaz, NR Landerz, T Shantharahavan, S Jeyagopikrishna SUPERVISED BY: Dr. JP Karunadasa Department of Electrical Engineering
    EXCERPT:
    4. POWER LINE CARRIER CHALLENGES Power lines and their associated networks are not designed for communication use. They are hostile environments that make the accurate propagation of communication signals difficult. Two of the biggest problems faced in using power lines for communications are excessive noise levels and cable attenuation. Noise levels are often excessive, and cable attenuation at the frequencies of interest is often very large. The most common causes of excessive noise in a domestic situation are the various household devices and office equipment connected to the network. Noise and disturbances on the power network include over voltages, under voltages, frequency variations and so on. However, the most harmful noise for PLCC applications is that superimposed on a power line. Switching devices such as light dimmers, induction motors in many common appliances and high-frequency noise caused by computer monitors and televisions often causes such superimposed noise.

  28. Urgent! Take Action – Preserve Telephone Access

    Please Distribute Widely!
    Even if you already commented, please read on. If there are points that you wish you had included, you can file an additional comment or a reply as well.

    I know that there may seem to be a lot of proceedings to comment in, but please take the time to submit a comment. Your comments build the basis of a legally actionable record. Without them, this ordeal will never end. Below is the link to the FCC public notice about the first trial to eliminate landline phone service as we know it. If you read through it, you will find that AT&T is seeking permission to do a trial to first voluntarily and eventually to force customers to transition to wireless or U-verse. Please let the Commission know what you think of this plan. Some points you may want to include are listed below. Please expand them by illustrating the hardships you personally will suffer if forced to give up your existing landline service, include documentation if possible.

    A template for your comment to can be found at: http://www.electricalpollution.com/documents/template_comment_fcc_14_285.doc .

    Thank you,
    Catherine

    http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-seeks-comment-att-proposed-technology-transitions-experiments

    FCC SEEKS COMMENT ON AT&T’S PROPOSAL FOR SERVICE-BASED

    TECHNOLOGY TRANSITIONS EXPERIMENTS

    GN Docket Nos. 12-353 and 13-5

    Comment Date:

    March 31, 2014
    Reply Comment Date:

    April 10, 2014

    You can submit your input during either the Comment period or the Reply period at http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/display?z=a7cs6

    To read all the info and instructions, go to: http://www.electricalpollution.com

  29. Parents and children protest a burger King cell tower in New Mexico

  30. Health effects of electromagnetic radiation exposure from cell phones, Wi-Fi, and Smart Meters, and strategies to reduce potential harm.
    Wednesday, November 20, 2013

    Everything You Wanted to Know about Cell Phone Radiation

    The FCC received more than 900 submissions regarding its cell phone radiation regulations. These documents reveal what we know about wireless radiation health effects, and why we need to strengthen regulations and provide precautionary warnings to the public.
    In response to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) request for input regarding its radiofrequency radiation regulations adopted in 1996, individuals and organizations submitted thousands of documents, testimonials, research papers and scientific publications that are now available to the media and to the public.

    These documents reveal what we know about wireless radiation health effects, and why we need to strengthen regulations and provide precautionary warnings to the public.

    Although fifteen countries have issued precautionary health warnings about cell phone radiation and recommendations on how to reduce risks, the wireless industry in the U.S. has opposed precautionary warnings and wants to weaken our radiation standards instead of strengthen them.

    http://www.saferemr.com/2013/11/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about.html

  31. U.S. Dept. of Interior attacks FCC regarding Adverse Impact of Cell Tower Radiation on Wildlife

    March 25, 2014 in -Mailing List, Miscellaneous by EMFacts

    The Department of Interior charges that the FCC standards for cell phone radiation are outmoded and no longer applicable as they do not adequately protect wildlife.

    PRLog (Press Release) – Mar. 24, 2014 – BERKELEY, Calif. — The Director of the Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance of the United States Department of the Interior sent a letter to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration in the Department of Commerce that addresses the Interior Department’s concern that cell tower radiation has had negative impacts on the health of migratory birds and other wildlife.

    The Interior Department accused the Federal government of employing outdated radiation standards set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a Federal agency with no expertise in health. The standards are no longer applicable because they control only for overheating and do not protect organisms from the adverse effects of exposure to the low-intensity radiation produced by cell phones and cell towers:

    “the electromagnetic radiation standards used by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continue to be based on thermal heating, a criterion now nearly 30 years out of date and inapplicable today.”

    The Department criticized the Federal government’s proposed procedures for placement and operation of communication towers, and called for “independent, third-party peer-reviewed studies” in the U.S. to examine the effects of cell tower radiation on “migratory birds and other trust species.”

    More information is available at:
    http://www.saferemr.com/2014/03/dept-of-interior-attacks-fcc-regarding.html

    Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.
    School of Public Health
    University of California, Berkeley

  32. Wireless Industry Kills Cell Phone Radiation Bill

    Topanga, CA — (SBWIRE) — 03/21/2014 –

    After landslide votes in both the house (83-56 in favor) and senate (21-14 in favor) of LD 1013, The Wireless Information Act’s historic passage was reversed, thanks to fast, furious and aggressive lobbying by the wireless industry, who filled the halls of the State House yesterday to ensure the bills failure to be enacted, which required a final vote in the House. In a 77 – 60 vote, the bill was reversed that morning.

    The wireless industry’s influence on possible health notification risks of their products has haunted the bill’s ability to pass from it’s inception nearly 5 years ago.

    This year, Representative Barry Hobbins, former AT@T attorney, sat as House Chair of the Energy, Utility and Technology Committee, where the bill was heard. Rep. Hobbins is well known to favor of the industry’s position. Despite Rep. Hobbins and attorney General Janet Mills efforts to quash the bill, it miraculously passed out of the committee with a 6-6 vote. “I think it’s about money in politics,” says Rep. Andrea Boland, author of the bill.

    Rep. Boland summarized as saying, “The issue was transparency and accountability. The industry fought to not let the public know what was in their manuals regarding RF radiation exposure. All manuals tell users to keep the phones at a distance from their heads and bodies but this industry won’t say openly not to hold devices against head and body. The industry was arguing against transparency and accountability and scaring off the legislators who had formally voted for it. It is deceitful.”

    Read full story:

    https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/protecting-people-from-electrosmog/u3IvNLb6CAE

  33. Category Smart Meter News Updates

    Smart Meter News

    Mar192014

    URGENT MESSAGE TO THE GLOBAL POPULATION!

    March 19, 2014

    Massachusetts Department of Utilities following the orders of our Government to mandate smart meters throughout the state as well as modernize and update the Power Grid enabling the Global Smart Grid Network. What does this mean to defenseless citizens of the planet? It means we will be prisoners of a blanket of proven lethal, microwave frequencies 24 hours a day; with no way to shield or defend ourselves from the assault generating from the wireless/fixed, mesh communication layer of the GLOBAL SMART GRID NETWORK.

    I have completed my second round comments for the DPU Docket 12-76. The evidence is in attachment files. The same evidence the State Regulatory Agencies have had in their possession going as far back 2007, when we filed our initial complaints about the noise impacting us in our home 24 hours a day. The complaints and detailed documentation preceded our knowledge of a smart meter or the technology. Our utility company, National Grid, came to our home and placed an Itron/ Centron wireless meter on our home in September of 2006. The FCC Id number was ID SK 9CIA. This was the same time line National Grid was approved to transmit a personal cellular mobile service in order to manage the data from the smart meters in our town. In 2006 they installed several repeaters on the poles and our town now had Wi-Fi. The same year, 2006 National Grid partnered with Hunt Technologies and turned on the power-line 2 way communication called GYR TS2 technology. All part of the AMI infrastructure. This is when the “illegal pure tones” invaded our home, property, town. Our awareness of the noise awakened us to the fact that this was not just happening on our property because we heard it everywhere we visited as well. We realized that this is why we were being stonewalled at every turn by the Government and State agencies. We uncovered a problem because we were motivated and continue to be, because of the relentless torture of being assaulted by the audible constant noise that we can’t escape and because of this our lives have been turned upside down. The upside of all this is that we have gathered evidence of the noise pollution deemed illegal and a health hazard by the EPA and by our State. (Any source creating a “pure tone” condition is illegal in Massachusetts), evidence of the dirty electricity. These are illegal emissions; being ignored by our State and Government. This is happening all over the world.

    Take the time to view our evidence; you can access it at: http://www.env.state.ma.us/DPU_FileRoom/frmDocketListSP.aspx Type into the box: 12-76 and it will take you to the filings. Open the filing by Sandra Chianfoni and its attachments will contain the evidence. Distribute widely. We must not allow this technology in our environment. There are solutions to gain control. Our governments know they can not pull this off if the public is properly educated and made aware of the dangers of this technology. We are not victims if we take control of our lives, but this can only happen collective. The submission may not appear for another week or so, for they have to process the information before posting it.

    I received an email this morning that says it all:

    My father lived through the Mussolini’s years back in Italy; he
    told me : Peter, even an idiot like Mussolini would not have done this (
    imposing this “grid”on people).
    What has happened to people here ? Have we
    lost our senses ?
    I have met many people here with the same symptoms you have
    described; we have not been able to pin point the cause in a way that could be
    stopped in the courts, and politicians look the other way, they wash their hands
    and say: “Not my fault, not my problem, not my jurisdiction, look elsewhere”.
    So, we run in circles like chickens in a cage with nowhere to go, just sit and
    suffer. Something is really wrong in all this.
    All I can do is do my best
    within the civic limits that I have at my disposal, and let God take care of the
    rest. And, He will do that for sure and very well.

    Keep well,
    Peter.

  34. National Grid, USA and other utilities across the country “turned on” in 2006- the 2 way communication fixed and wired TS2 Landis-GYR AMI (mesh layer) network. THIS IS WHEN THE CONSTANT NOISE STARTED RADIATING IN OUR AIR. Carried by the interconnected power grid; turning the wires into one big continuous antenna and electromagnetic weapon!!! This must be stopped. Time for our engineers, professionals, experts to pay attention to the biggest death weapon directed at the entire population while assaulting us with NOISE, DIRTY ELECTRICITY 24/7.

    BE ON NOTICE THAT ALL VENDORS, SUB CONTRACTORS, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES: YOU ARE ALL SUBJECT TO MAJOR LAWS AND IT WILL HAPPEN; BECAUSE OF YOUR NEGLIGENCE AND WILLFUL CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE YOU WILL BE MADE ACCOUNTABLE.

    YOUR PRODUCTS ARE NOT SAFE OR HEALTHY FOR HUMANS OR WILDLIFE. YOU WILL BE PROSECUTED FOR THESE CRIMES. IT IS A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION WHO ARE RUNNING OUR LIVES. TIME TO WAKE UP PEOPLE! TURN OFF YOUR WIRLESS DEVICES, TAKE CONTROL. SEND A MESSAGE TO THESE DISPICIBLE, GREED MOTIVATED SCUM OF THE EARTH. THEY USE THEIR MONEY AND INFLUENCE TO BUY CONTROL OF OUR LIVES AND THEY WILL NOT STOP THIS INSANITY UNTIL WE STOP THEM!

    Hunt Technologies Will Showcase New AMI Systems and Functionality at Autovation

    Oct 16, 2006 – Landis+Gyr Group
    Vendor:
    Landis+Gyr Group

    Landis+Gyr Group
    Hunt Technologies, a global leader in advanced metering and energy efficiency technologies for electric, water and gas, will launch exciting additions to its complete set of advanced metering solutions at Autovation 2006. Among the highlights will be presentations on StatSignal, Hunt’s dynamic two-way RF mesh network solution, streaming interval data from Hunt’s TS2 power line carrier AMI system, and the advanced data management solution Command Center™ MDM. “These new systems and capabilities further our ability to deliver a total advanced metering solution from the meter to the utility office by implementing the best-fit technology for each application,” said Dave Gervenak, Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Hunt. StatSignal’s technology creates an auto-intelligent routing mesh network that adjusts to various RF environments, creating higher system performance and reliability receiving hourly and sub-hourly billing, power quality, and event data . Another benefit is the system’s scalability and accessibility, features that will be further enhanced with the planned integration into Hunt’s Command Center data management system. “StatSignal is the first RF mesh network to demonstrate true auto-intelligent routing of data, plug-and-play deployment and true two-way data acquisition and control,” said Elden Grace, StatSignal System Marketing Manager. “Furthermore, the integration with Command Center will make Hunt the first AMI solutions provider to offer a single software platform for both RF mesh and power line carrier (PLC) technologies.” Hunt will also introduce streaming interval data functionality for TS2 system users. Streaming data provides a continuous flow of selected data, as opposed to batches of data received from traditional hourly interval data. The function will not be limited to kWh values. Utilities will be able to choose what data value to stream, and the function can be turned on and off at each endpoint. “Streaming data will be both accurate and reliable. We’ve been able to add this feature while retaining the daily standard packet that protects billing data integrity and allows time of use and critical peak pricing to be calculated at the endpoint,” said Al Swanson, Hunt’s Senior Product Manager. This feature will improve interaction with utility customers and allow display of customer usage on an Internet portal within one to two hours. It will also enable efficient energy management by providing operations and engineering personnel with the tools to better regulate voltage, predict pending system peak periods and conduct more efficient load balancing studies. In addition, visitors to Hunt’s Autovation booth (#325) will be able to view demonstrations of Command Center MDM, an enhanced version of Command Center that will include full application integration and utilize a data warehouse for increased scalability and faster reporting. Information will also be available about prepaid metering, outage management, software systems integration and best-fit technologies for any deployment scenario. Hunt Technologies’ advanced metering portfolio includes the TS1 one-way PLC system, TS2 two-way PLC advanced system, AirPoint™ mobile AMR modules, and StatSignal two-way RF mesh AMI solution. About Hunt Technologies, Inc. Hunt Technologies uses innovative technology to provide the widest range of options for utilities seeking AMI (advanced metering infrastructure) solutions. Hunt provides power line carrier and RF-technology for monitoring electric, water and gas meters. Based in central Minnesota, Hunt develops and supports hardware and software for 500 utilities worldwide. For more information on Hunt

    Technologies, visit http://www.hunttechnologies.com.

    Landis+Gyr Group

    http://ec.webenabled.net/article/06/10/hunt-technologies-will-showcase-new-ami-systems-and-functionality-autovation?quicktabs_4=1&quicktabs_11=0&quicktabs_6=1

  35. Web Links for ARRL Technical Papers
    FCC BPL Notice of Inquiry Filings
    BPL Feed Method Analysis

    Fields Near Large Radiators

    Power Lines as Antennas

    Calculated Impact of BPL Signals on Amateur Radio

    Exhibit A: Summary of ARRL Studies of BPL Field Trial Areas

    FCC BPL Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Filings
    Exhibit A: (Metavox testing in Emmaus and Whitehall, PA)

    Exhibits B-E:

    Exhibit B: PLC/HF compatibility: Written by Dr. David Cohen. This paper outlines the reasons to base interference assessment on a reasonable value of I/N (interference to noise) and the reasons that BPL operating at the FCC limits would be tens of dB higher than that. It cites several peer-reviewed papers published in various IEEE publications.
    Exhibit C: Extrapolation, point sources vs line sources
    Exhibit D: Proposed test methods
    Exhibit E: Amateur Service protection requirements, mobile measurements. This filing, written by various ARRL staff, outlines the levels of noise that can be expected during HF operation and a reasonable protection requirement for such operation. This paper references the ITU-R P372-8 document, outlining the median values of man-made noise in residential environments and how the noise levels permitted under Part 15 rules are tens of dB greater than the present median levels of man-made noise. This premise was supported by measurements of man-made noise in typical residential environments.

    http://www.arrl.org/technical-papers-and-studies

  36. December 5, 2013

    U-M researchers highlight hazards of noise pollution

    By Laurel Thomas Gnagey
    ​Michigan News

    Topic: Health & Medicine, Research

    As the nation continues to focus on health care prevention through reform, one cause of serious illness and even death gets ignored — environmental noise pollution.

    Researchers at the School of Public Health and the Network for Public Health Law say the problem not only takes its toll on hearing, but contributes to heart disease, hypertension, sleep disturbances, stress, learning problems and even injuries.

    “I can’t think of any other environmental hazard that affects so many people and yet is so ignored,” said Rick Neitzel, assistant professor of environmental science.

    In an article published Thursday in Environmental Health Perspectives, Neitzel and colleague Monica Hammer lay out a case for federal, state and local officials to address the issue that impacts an estimated 104 million people exposed at levels loud enough to cause serious noise-related health problems.

    “Everyone complains about noise, yet we do virtually nothing about it in this country,” Neitzel said. “Noise is really up there in terms of health problems it causes, but it gets no attention — especially compared to other common exposures such as air pollution.

    “There are a lot of assumptions that noise exposure is self-inflicted, which is often not the case. We’d like to have people see connections beyond hearing loss and expand the conversation.”

    In the article, Neitzel and Hammer call for noise to be included in the federal public health agenda and suggest ways state and local governments can then use the law to enact their own prevention measures to cover any shortfalls. The researchers point out that Congress has not considered the subject of noise in more than 30 years.

    Included in their recommendations for the U.S. National Prevention Strategy, an organization representing 17 federal agencies responsible for prevention goals under the Affordable Care Act, are suggestions that the NPS:

    • Exert noise control through direct regulation, setting maximum emissions levels.

    • Require emissions disclosure on products, such as children’s toys.

    • Improve information dissemination about the dangers of noise.

    • Conduct more research to fully understand the impact of noise on the population.

    The researchers also suggest ways states and local governments could fill the gaps:

    • Enact regulations on sources of noise that aren’t covered by the Environmental Protection Agency or other federal agencies.

    • Adopt procurement policies to reduce community noise caused by construction, emergency vehicles and maintenance equipment.

    • Take steps to build or renovate housing that protects people from noise.

    The EPA has recommended limits over a 24-hour period for noise exposure in residential areas of 55 A-weighted decibels (dBA) to protect the public from all adverse health effects, and 70 dBA to prevent hearing loss.

    People are exposed to noise levels beyond these recommendations, often due to a cumulative effect from road and rail traffic, air transportation, occupational and industrial activities, amplified music, recreational activities and firearms.

    Neitzel’s recent research includes a 2012 study showing that 90 percent of New York City urban mass transit riders may be at risk of some permanent, irreversible noise-induced hearing loss caused by train and occupational noises and Mp3 player use.

    “Evidence shows that people exposed to unwanted noise develop a learned helplessness response. We end up believing that there is nothing that can be done to change our environment, when in fact there are many options available to us,” said Hammer, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Visiting Attorney at the Network for Public Health Law Mid-States Region at U-M.

    “Right now with the move to a national comprehensive health system, it pays to focus on prevention. If you only look at it from a monetary standpoint, we can save dollars in the long term and keep people healthy and living longer.”

    http://record.umich.edu/articles/u-m-researchers-highlight-hazards-noise-pollution#comment-371

  37. California, Valley Vista School Irradiating Children 40X Higher than FCC Maximum Exposure Limits!!!

    Website documenting the evidence including letter to the school board, parents letters to OSHA

    Classroom RF/EMF Counter Based on FCC/OSHA-Approved Calculations

    http://rfemf.com/counter.html#calcs
    The Cisco 4410N WAP has been irradiating teachers and children in the classroom, pictured below, every minute of every school day — for no educational benefit. The RF/EMF microwave radiation levels in this classroom exceed federal safety guidelines many times, every day, based on total cumulative radiation exposure. This cumulative calculation method was confirmed by senior FCC and OSHA engineers. In August 2013, these engineers analyzed the radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF/EMF) measurement in this classroom and agreed that the math driving the animation, below, is correct. See the totals below.

    Please note, the calculated totals exclude radiation from any wireless devices in use in the classroom. Actual totals could be 25x-30x higher when students are using wirelessly-connected iPads, Chromebooks or laptops. Similar RF/EMF total cumulative exposure levels can be calculated for any classroom in the school district, using information provided by California Public Information Requests, accurate RF/EMF measurements and these FCC-and-OSHA-approved calculations.

    • California, Valley Vista School Irradiating Children 40X Higher than FCC Maximum Exposure Limits!!!

      Dates

      Key Events/Activities in 2013

      Feb 21 Mtg. w/Mr. Rose & Mr. Cole re: evidence of RF/EMF health effects
      Mar 5 Email from Mr. Rose: despite evidence, PCSD will expand wi-fi
      Mar 6 Mtg. w/Ms. Kleinholz re: school tour
      Mar 25 Mtg. w/Ms. Kleinholz re: scientific evidence of RF/EMF health effects
      Apr 15 Mtg. w/Mr. Bolman re: scientific evidence of RF/EMF health effects
      Apr 22 Email from Mr. Bolman: despite evidence, PCSD will expand wi-fi
      May 14 Presentation to Valley Vista School Council re: dangers of wi-fi
      May 14 PCSD Brd. Mtg. public comment re: dangers of wi-fi
      May 28 PCSD Brd. Mtg. public comment re: other countries removing wi-fi
      June 11 PCSD Brd. Mtg.: spoke about dangers and high cost of tech plan
      Dangerous 2013-2018 Technology Plan approved 3-0 by School Board.
      June 21 Mtg. w/Ms. Kleinholz re: non-consent to expose children to RF/EMF
      June 25 PCSD Brd. Mtg. public comment re: opposing bylaw change
      June 26 PCSD refuses to measure RF/EMF in MCCV kindergarten room
      June 26 Mr. Bolman sends letter telling us to find another school/district
      July 16 MCCV Principal Carvey refuses to turn off WAP in kindergarten room
      Aug 6 PCSD communicates it installed 10 WAPS on Valley Vista campus
      Aug 7-19 Mr. Bolman/Ms. Kleinholz illegally block access to public records
      Aug 20 Mr. Bolman releases report of RESIG magnetic field metering
      Aug 21 Filed non-consent for exposing children to RF/EMF at Valley Vista
      Aug 22 Mtg. w/Ms. Kleinholz: metered 17,500 µW/m² in VV kindergarten room
      Sept 10 PCSD Brd. Mtg. public comment re: metering & FCC/OSHA analysis
      Nov 6 Presentation at Mary Collins at Cherry Valley School
      Nov 12 PCSD Brd. Mtg. public comment re: negligence of board members
      Nov 22 Mtg. w/Ms. Kleinholz re: reasons for not turning off WAP in kindergarten.
      She provided no reasons and refused to discuss the matter.
      Dec 11 Launch of rfemf.com web site: http://www.rfemf.com

      What Has The School Board Done Since 6/11/13?

      The School Board members are accountable, yet there is no evidence they have made any progress on addressing the important RF/EMF health and safety issues. What are they waiting for?

  38. NIH announces recruitment for clinical trial to test new tinnitus treatment device
    “Tinnitus affects nearly 24 million adult Americans,” said James F. Battey, Jr., M.D., Ph.D., director of the NIDCD. “It is also the number one service-connected disability for returning veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan.

    “Tinnitus affects nearly 24 million adult Americans,” said James F. Battey, Jr., M.D., Ph.D., director of the NIDCD. “It is also the number one service-connected disability for returning veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan. The kind of nervous system stimuli used in this study has already been shown to safely and effectively help people with epilepsy or depression. This therapy could offer a profoundly better way to treat tinnitus.”

    Most cases of chronic tinnitus are preceded by a loss of hearing as the result of damage to the inner ear from aging, injury, or long-term exposure to loud noise. When sensory cells in the inner ear are damaged, the resulting hearing loss changes some of the signals sent from the ear to neurons in the auditory cortex of the brain. (SANDAURA NOTATION- ‘PURE TONE’ EXPOSURE CAUSES TINNITUS AND HEARING LOSS AS WELL. A PURE TONE IS A SINGLE FREQUENCY MEASURED TO BE IN THE ENVIRONMENT 90% OF THE ITME WHICH LIMIT WORKERS EXPOSURE IN AN 8 HOUR SHIFT. THE NOISE POLLUTION IN OUR CURRENT ENVIRONMENT WE ARE EXPOSED TO 100% OF THE TIME!) Scientists still haven’t agreed upon what happens to create the illusion of sound when there is none, but the therapy being tested in this new clinical trial attempts to ameliorate the phantom sound of tinnitus by going to its source – the brain.

    http://www.nih.gov/news/health/mar2014/nidcd-06.htm

    Note – The military personel serving in Iraq and Afghanistan were probably exposed to high levels of radio frequency radiation from communications equipment, radar and antennas on bases. This may give a clue to the cause of their tinnitus.

    Many people who suffer from electro hypersensitivity also suffer from tinnitus.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 217 other followers

%d bloggers like this: